Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF

Eduardo Fernandes
{"title":"Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF","authors":"Eduardo Fernandes","doi":"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has for object the parameterization undertaken by the thesis fixed by the STF as to what is a gross error in the context of public policies developed to face the sanitary and economic developments of the Civid-19 pandemic. In turn, the objective is to debate how the established thesis tend to be interpreted considering of the STF's jurisprudence regarding the application of the precautionary principle.","PeriodicalId":346094,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","volume":"294 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article has for object the parameterization undertaken by the thesis fixed by the STF as to what is a gross error in the context of public policies developed to face the sanitary and economic developments of the Civid-19 pandemic. In turn, the objective is to debate how the established thesis tend to be interpreted considering of the STF's jurisprudence regarding the application of the precautionary principle.
行动和预防的义务:根据STF在MP nº966/2020的合宪性判决中确立的论点进行分析
本文以STF所确定的论文所进行的参数化为目标,即在为应对covid -19大流行的卫生和经济发展而制定的公共政策背景下,什么是严重错误。反过来,我们的目标是讨论考虑到STF关于预防原则的适用的判例,如何解释既定的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信