Electronic institutions and neural computing providing law-compliance privacy for trusting agents

Q1 Mathematics
Mar Lopez , Javier Carbo , Jose M. Molina , Juanita Pedraza
{"title":"Electronic institutions and neural computing providing law-compliance privacy for trusting agents","authors":"Mar Lopez ,&nbsp;Javier Carbo ,&nbsp;Jose M. Molina ,&nbsp;Juanita Pedraza","doi":"10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we present an integral solution for law-compliance privacy-protection into trust models for agent systems. Several privacy issues are concerned into trust relationships. Specifically, we define which privacy rights must legally be guaranteed in trusting communities of agents. From them, we describe additional interaction protocols that are required to implement such guarantees. Next, we apply additional message exchanges into a specific application domain (the Agent Trust and Reputation testbed) using JADE agent platform. The decisions about how to apply these control mechanisms (about when to launch the corresponding JADE protocol) has been efficiently carried out by neural computing. It uses past behavior of agents to decide (classify) which agents are worthy to share privacy with, considering which number of past interactions we should take into account. Furthermore, we also enumerate the corresponding privacy violations that would have taken place if these control mechanisms (in form of interaction protocols) were ignored or misused. From the possible existence of privacy violations, a regulatory structure is required to address (prevent and fix) the corresponding harmful consequences. We use Islander (an electronic institution editor) to formally define the scenes where privacy violation may be produced, attached to the ways to repair it: the defeasible actions that could voluntarily reduce or eliminate the privacy damage, and the obligations that the electronic institution would impose as penalties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Logic","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 119-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.019","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157086831630074X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper we present an integral solution for law-compliance privacy-protection into trust models for agent systems. Several privacy issues are concerned into trust relationships. Specifically, we define which privacy rights must legally be guaranteed in trusting communities of agents. From them, we describe additional interaction protocols that are required to implement such guarantees. Next, we apply additional message exchanges into a specific application domain (the Agent Trust and Reputation testbed) using JADE agent platform. The decisions about how to apply these control mechanisms (about when to launch the corresponding JADE protocol) has been efficiently carried out by neural computing. It uses past behavior of agents to decide (classify) which agents are worthy to share privacy with, considering which number of past interactions we should take into account. Furthermore, we also enumerate the corresponding privacy violations that would have taken place if these control mechanisms (in form of interaction protocols) were ignored or misused. From the possible existence of privacy violations, a regulatory structure is required to address (prevent and fix) the corresponding harmful consequences. We use Islander (an electronic institution editor) to formally define the scenes where privacy violation may be produced, attached to the ways to repair it: the defeasible actions that could voluntarily reduce or eliminate the privacy damage, and the obligations that the electronic institution would impose as penalties.

电子机构和神经计算为信任代理提供守法隐私
本文提出了一种将合规性隐私保护集成到代理系统信任模型中的整体解决方案。信任关系涉及到几个隐私问题。具体来说,我们定义了哪些隐私权必须在可信的代理社区中得到法律保障。在此基础上,我们描述了实现此类保证所需的其他交互协议。接下来,我们使用JADE代理平台将额外的消息交换应用到特定的应用程序域(代理信任和信誉测试平台)。关于如何应用这些控制机制(关于何时启动相应的JADE协议)的决策已通过神经计算有效地执行。它使用代理过去的行为来决定(分类)哪些代理值得与之共享隐私,考虑到我们应该考虑多少过去的交互。此外,我们还列举了如果这些控制机制(以交互协议的形式)被忽视或滥用,将会发生的相应的隐私侵犯。从可能存在的侵犯隐私的情况来看,需要一个监管结构来解决(防止和修复)相应的有害后果。我们使用Islander(电子机构编辑器)正式定义了可能产生隐私侵犯的场景,并附带了修复方法:可以自愿减少或消除隐私损害的可行行动,以及电子机构将作为惩罚施加的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Logic
Journal of Applied Logic COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
1.13
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信