Learning from defect removals

N. Ayewah, W. Pugh
{"title":"Learning from defect removals","authors":"N. Ayewah, W. Pugh","doi":"10.1109/MSR.2009.5069500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research has tried to identify changes in source code repositories that fix bugs by linking these changes to reports in issue tracking systems. These changes have been traced back to the point in time when they were previously modified as a way of identifying bug introducing changes. But we observe that not all changes linked to bug tracking systems are fixing bugs; some are enhancing the code. Furthermore, not all fixes are applied at the point in the code where the bug was originally introduced. We flesh out these observations with a manual review of several software projects, and use this opportunity to see how many defects are in the scope of static analysis tools.","PeriodicalId":413721,"journal":{"name":"2009 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2009.5069500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Recent research has tried to identify changes in source code repositories that fix bugs by linking these changes to reports in issue tracking systems. These changes have been traced back to the point in time when they were previously modified as a way of identifying bug introducing changes. But we observe that not all changes linked to bug tracking systems are fixing bugs; some are enhancing the code. Furthermore, not all fixes are applied at the point in the code where the bug was originally introduced. We flesh out these observations with a manual review of several software projects, and use this opportunity to see how many defects are in the scope of static analysis tools.
从缺陷移除中学习
最近的研究试图通过将这些更改链接到问题跟踪系统中的报告来识别源代码存储库中修复错误的更改。这些更改可以追溯到它们之前被修改的时间点,作为识别引入更改的bug的一种方式。但我们观察到,并非所有与bug跟踪系统相关的更改都在修复bug;一些公司正在改进代码。此外,并不是所有的修复都应用于最初引入错误的代码点。我们通过对几个软件项目的手工审查来充实这些观察结果,并利用这个机会来查看静态分析工具范围内有多少缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信