KEABSAHAN TANDA TANGAN ELEKTRONIK PADA AKTA NOTARIS

Jenny Divia Fitcanisa, Busyra Azheri
{"title":"KEABSAHAN TANDA TANGAN ELEKTRONIK PADA AKTA NOTARIS","authors":"Jenny Divia Fitcanisa, Busyra Azheri","doi":"10.54443/sibatik.v2i5.809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of information and electronic technology, which is currently increasing rapidly, has an impact on the Notary's work related to the signing of the Notary deed. The cyber notary concept contained in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary (hereinafter referred to as UUJN) in the elucidation of Article 15 paragraph (3) states that there are other powers for a Notary, namely the authority to certify transactions carried out electronically (cyber notary) but in the absence of regulations regarding this matter it seems to be an obstacle to the implementation of electronic signing. Based on this, the authors formulate the problem, namely, first how to regulate norms regarding electronic signatures on notarial deeds, Second, how are the requirements for an electronic signature on a notary deed to be considered legally valid. This study uses a juridical-normative approach. The results of this research study indicate that the regulation of Cyber notary has not been regulated in Indonesia so because there is no regulation regarding the electronic signing of the notary deed, the notary cannot carry out the signing of the deed electronically under any circumstances. The legal requirements relating to the electronic signature do not meet the requirements for a valid signature on a notary deed because according to Article 16 UUJN it requires the signature to be carried out directly by the appearer or the parties before the notary.","PeriodicalId":308284,"journal":{"name":"SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v2i5.809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of information and electronic technology, which is currently increasing rapidly, has an impact on the Notary's work related to the signing of the Notary deed. The cyber notary concept contained in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary (hereinafter referred to as UUJN) in the elucidation of Article 15 paragraph (3) states that there are other powers for a Notary, namely the authority to certify transactions carried out electronically (cyber notary) but in the absence of regulations regarding this matter it seems to be an obstacle to the implementation of electronic signing. Based on this, the authors formulate the problem, namely, first how to regulate norms regarding electronic signatures on notarial deeds, Second, how are the requirements for an electronic signature on a notary deed to be considered legally valid. This study uses a juridical-normative approach. The results of this research study indicate that the regulation of Cyber notary has not been regulated in Indonesia so because there is no regulation regarding the electronic signing of the notary deed, the notary cannot carry out the signing of the deed electronically under any circumstances. The legal requirements relating to the electronic signature do not meet the requirements for a valid signature on a notary deed because according to Article 16 UUJN it requires the signature to be carried out directly by the appearer or the parties before the notary.
电子签名在公证文件上
信息和电子技术的飞速发展对公证员签署公证契据的相关工作产生了影响。2014年第2号法律对2004年第30号法律(以下简称“ujn”)关于公证员地位的修正案中包含的网络公证员概念在第15条第3款的阐明中指出,公证员还有其他权力,即证明电子交易的权力(网络公证员),但在缺乏有关此事的规定的情况下,这似乎是实施电子签名的障碍。在此基础上,笔者提出了以下问题:一是如何规范公证契据上的电子签名;二是如何认定公证契据上的电子签名具有法律效力。本研究采用司法规范方法。本研究的结果表明,印度尼西亚尚未对网络公证进行监管,因此由于没有关于公证契约电子签名的规定,公证员在任何情况下都无法以电子方式进行契约签署。有关电子签名的法律要求不符合公证契据上有效签名的要求,因为根据联合国宪章第16条的规定,要求由出庭人或当事人直接在公证员面前进行签名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信