A comparison of stream mining algorithms on botnet detection

Guilherme Henrique Ribeiro, Elaine Ribeiro de Faria Paiva, R. Miani
{"title":"A comparison of stream mining algorithms on botnet detection","authors":"Guilherme Henrique Ribeiro, Elaine Ribeiro de Faria Paiva, R. Miani","doi":"10.1145/3407023.3407053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent botnet activities targeting IoT infrastructure and turning computing devices into cryptocurrency miners indicate an increase in the botnet attack surface and capabilities. These facts emphasize the importance of investigating alternative methods for detecting botnets. One of them is using stream mining algorithms to classify malicious network traffic. Although some initiatives seek to adopt stream mining strategies to detect botnets, several research topics still need to be discussed. Our goal is to compare the use of single and ensemble-based stream mining algorithms to identify botnet network flows. Since obtaining examples of malicious network flows could be a hassle to security managers, we also investigate whether the use of ensembles could reduce the number of labeled instances required to update the classification model. Our results indicate that the ensemble-based Ozaboost algorithm with the prequential evaluation strategy outperforms the other selected algorithms. We also found that ensemble-based algorithms and some botnet characteristics (C&C communication protocol) requires less labeled instances while maintains high performance.","PeriodicalId":121225,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3407023.3407053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Recent botnet activities targeting IoT infrastructure and turning computing devices into cryptocurrency miners indicate an increase in the botnet attack surface and capabilities. These facts emphasize the importance of investigating alternative methods for detecting botnets. One of them is using stream mining algorithms to classify malicious network traffic. Although some initiatives seek to adopt stream mining strategies to detect botnets, several research topics still need to be discussed. Our goal is to compare the use of single and ensemble-based stream mining algorithms to identify botnet network flows. Since obtaining examples of malicious network flows could be a hassle to security managers, we also investigate whether the use of ensembles could reduce the number of labeled instances required to update the classification model. Our results indicate that the ensemble-based Ozaboost algorithm with the prequential evaluation strategy outperforms the other selected algorithms. We also found that ensemble-based algorithms and some botnet characteristics (C&C communication protocol) requires less labeled instances while maintains high performance.
流挖掘算法在僵尸网络检测中的比较
最近针对物联网基础设施和将计算设备转变为加密货币矿工的僵尸网络活动表明,僵尸网络的攻击面和能力都在增加。这些事实强调了研究检测僵尸网络的替代方法的重要性。其中之一是使用流挖掘算法对恶意网络流量进行分类。虽然一些倡议寻求采用流挖掘策略来检测僵尸网络,但仍有几个研究课题需要讨论。我们的目标是比较使用单一和基于集成的流挖掘算法来识别僵尸网络流。由于获取恶意网络流的示例对于安全管理人员来说可能是一个麻烦,因此我们还研究了使用集成是否可以减少更新分类模型所需的标记实例的数量。我们的研究结果表明,基于集合的Ozaboost算法与优先评估策略优于其他选择的算法。我们还发现基于集成的算法和一些僵尸网络特征(C&C通信协议)在保持高性能的同时需要较少的标记实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信