Metrological properties evaluation of a chest wall simulator during simulated quiet breathing

C. Massaroni, F. Leo, E. Schena, P. Saccomandi, S. Silvestri
{"title":"Metrological properties evaluation of a chest wall simulator during simulated quiet breathing","authors":"C. Massaroni, F. Leo, E. Schena, P. Saccomandi, S. Silvestri","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opto-electronic Plethysmography (OEP) is a motion analysis system used to measure chest wall kinematics and to indirectly evaluate respiratory volumes during breathing. Its working principle is based on the time-per-time computation of marker displacements placed on the thorax. This work aims at evaluating the metrological properties of a custom made chest wall simulator (CWS) developed to reproduce human chest wall kinematic. The CWS metrological properties were estimated by the comparison of two different motion control strategies of the CWS: the first one is based on the script writing into each motion controller, the second one on macro command sent to the CWS. Three sets of experiments were carried out with the aim to: (i) evaluate precision and accuracy in performing target displacements (i.e., ranging from 2 mm to 8 mm), (ii) evaluate the differences between set and simulated breathing period (i.e., from 10 to 30 breathing per minute), and (iii) assess the movement reproducibility. The precision error, expressed as the ratio between measurement uncertainty and the measured displacement, is always lower than 0.32% (27 μm) with script-based motion control and 0.25% (6 μm) with the macro one, for all the target displacements. The difference between the simulated breathing period and the set one is always lower than 0.30 s in both strategies of motion control (percentage error always lower than 15%). Standard deviation between measure, assumed as reproducibility index, showed values always lower than 37 μm. These performances allows considering both the strategies of control adoptable to be employed for CWS motion control during the OEP performance in further works.","PeriodicalId":277757,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Opto-electronic Plethysmography (OEP) is a motion analysis system used to measure chest wall kinematics and to indirectly evaluate respiratory volumes during breathing. Its working principle is based on the time-per-time computation of marker displacements placed on the thorax. This work aims at evaluating the metrological properties of a custom made chest wall simulator (CWS) developed to reproduce human chest wall kinematic. The CWS metrological properties were estimated by the comparison of two different motion control strategies of the CWS: the first one is based on the script writing into each motion controller, the second one on macro command sent to the CWS. Three sets of experiments were carried out with the aim to: (i) evaluate precision and accuracy in performing target displacements (i.e., ranging from 2 mm to 8 mm), (ii) evaluate the differences between set and simulated breathing period (i.e., from 10 to 30 breathing per minute), and (iii) assess the movement reproducibility. The precision error, expressed as the ratio between measurement uncertainty and the measured displacement, is always lower than 0.32% (27 μm) with script-based motion control and 0.25% (6 μm) with the macro one, for all the target displacements. The difference between the simulated breathing period and the set one is always lower than 0.30 s in both strategies of motion control (percentage error always lower than 15%). Standard deviation between measure, assumed as reproducibility index, showed values always lower than 37 μm. These performances allows considering both the strategies of control adoptable to be employed for CWS motion control during the OEP performance in further works.
模拟安静呼吸时胸壁模拟器的计量特性评价
光电容积描记仪(OEP)是一种运动分析系统,用于测量胸壁运动和间接评估呼吸过程中的呼吸量。它的工作原理是基于每次计算放置在胸腔上的标记位移。这项工作的目的是评估一个定制的胸壁模拟器(CWS)的计量特性,开发复制人体胸壁的运动学。通过比较CWS的两种不同运动控制策略来估计CWS的计量特性:第一种是基于向每个运动控制器写入脚本的运动控制策略,第二种是基于向CWS发送宏命令的运动控制策略。进行了三组实验,目的是:(i)评估执行目标位移的精度和准确性(即从2毫米到8毫米),(ii)评估设定和模拟呼吸周期之间的差异(即从每分钟10到30次呼吸),以及(iii)评估运动可重复性。对于所有目标位移,基于脚本的运动控制的精度误差(测量不确定度与测量位移之比)均小于0.32% (27 μm),而基于宏控制的精度误差则小于0.25% (6 μm)。两种运动控制策略的模拟呼吸周期与设定呼吸周期之差均小于0.30 s(百分比误差均小于15%)。测量间的标准差均小于37 μm,作为重复性指标。这些性能允许在进一步的工作中考虑在OEP性能期间用于CWS运动控制的可采用的控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信