A Rapid Scoping Review of Gender Inequities in the Medical Profession

A. V. Ros, S. Markham, Diane Wu, P. Nicholas
{"title":"A Rapid Scoping Review of Gender Inequities in the Medical Profession","authors":"A. V. Ros, S. Markham, Diane Wu, P. Nicholas","doi":"10.55481/2578-3750.1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Rapid Scoping Review of Gender Inequities in the Medical Profession Ana M. Viamonte Ros, MD, MPH; Sanford M. Markham, FACOG, FACS; Diane Wu, MD, MPH, CCFP; Patrice K. Nicholas, DNSc, DHL (Hon.), MPH, RN, NP-C, FAAN, MGH Introduction: There continue to be large inequities in the representation of women at progressive levels of training and seniority in both academic and community practice settings. Gender inequity in medicine is not only problematic in its own right but has the potential to deliver inequitable outcomes, including the neglect of important research and care that continues to disadvantage women patients. As significant evidence is emerging on gender inequities in the medical profession, it is an opportune time to review the current evidence on the persisting gaps, potential causes, and possible solutions. Methods: A rapid scoping r eview was conducted for ar ticles on the topic of gender inequity and the medical profession in PubMed and Google Scholar. The search was limited to articles published from 1990 to the search date (June 1, 2017), and included only papers published in English. Results: An initial 1055 articles were screened according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria. After initial and full-text review, supplemented by a hand search through the article references, 45 articles were included in the review. Articles were classified as a) evidence for gender inequities, b) causes of inequities, and c) solutions for inequities. Only 13% of articles found (6 studies) addressed possible interventions to reduce inequities. Significant gaps exist in the literature, particularly around part-time work options, parental and family leave options, and addressing implicit biases to reduce sexism in professional settings. Discussion: The evidence highlights substantial inequities in the representation of women in the medical profession, in both the academic and community settings, in medical literature, and in leadership positions. This review also highlighted substantial gaps in the literature on understanding what can be done to reduce these gaps. More research is needed in the area of gender inequities in medicine to improve the representation of women in","PeriodicalId":135706,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55481/2578-3750.1033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A Rapid Scoping Review of Gender Inequities in the Medical Profession Ana M. Viamonte Ros, MD, MPH; Sanford M. Markham, FACOG, FACS; Diane Wu, MD, MPH, CCFP; Patrice K. Nicholas, DNSc, DHL (Hon.), MPH, RN, NP-C, FAAN, MGH Introduction: There continue to be large inequities in the representation of women at progressive levels of training and seniority in both academic and community practice settings. Gender inequity in medicine is not only problematic in its own right but has the potential to deliver inequitable outcomes, including the neglect of important research and care that continues to disadvantage women patients. As significant evidence is emerging on gender inequities in the medical profession, it is an opportune time to review the current evidence on the persisting gaps, potential causes, and possible solutions. Methods: A rapid scoping r eview was conducted for ar ticles on the topic of gender inequity and the medical profession in PubMed and Google Scholar. The search was limited to articles published from 1990 to the search date (June 1, 2017), and included only papers published in English. Results: An initial 1055 articles were screened according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria. After initial and full-text review, supplemented by a hand search through the article references, 45 articles were included in the review. Articles were classified as a) evidence for gender inequities, b) causes of inequities, and c) solutions for inequities. Only 13% of articles found (6 studies) addressed possible interventions to reduce inequities. Significant gaps exist in the literature, particularly around part-time work options, parental and family leave options, and addressing implicit biases to reduce sexism in professional settings. Discussion: The evidence highlights substantial inequities in the representation of women in the medical profession, in both the academic and community settings, in medical literature, and in leadership positions. This review also highlighted substantial gaps in the literature on understanding what can be done to reduce these gaps. More research is needed in the area of gender inequities in medicine to improve the representation of women in
医学专业性别不平等的快速范围审查
医学专业性别不平等的快速范围审查Ana M. Viamonte Ros,医学博士,公共卫生硕士;Sanford M. Markham, FACOG, FACS;吴黛安,医学博士,公共卫生硕士,CCFP;Patrice K. Nicholas, DNSc, DHL (Hon.), MPH, RN, NP-C, FAAN, MGH简介:在学术和社区实践环境中,在培训和资历的进步水平上,女性的代表性仍然存在很大的不平等。医学中的性别不平等不仅本身就有问题,而且有可能产生不公平的结果,包括忽视重要的研究和护理,继续使女性患者处于不利地位。由于出现了关于医疗行业性别不平等的重要证据,现在是审查关于持续存在的差距、潜在原因和可能解决办法的现有证据的好时机。方法:对PubMed和Google Scholar中关于性别不平等和医学专业主题的文章进行快速范围审查。检索限于从1990年到检索日期(2017年6月1日)发表的文章,并且仅包括以英文发表的论文。结果:根据确定的纳入和排除标准筛选了最初的1055篇文章。经过初步和全文审查,并辅以手工检索文章参考文献,45篇文章被纳入审查。文章被分类为a)性别不平等的证据,b)不平等的原因,c)不平等的解决方案。只有13%的文章(6项研究)讨论了减少不平等的可能干预措施。文献中存在着巨大的差距,特别是在兼职工作选择、父母和家庭休假选择以及解决隐性偏见以减少专业环境中的性别歧视方面。讨论:证据突出表明,在学术和社区环境、医学文献和领导职位上,妇女在医疗专业中的代表性存在严重不平等。本综述还强调了在理解如何减少这些差距方面的文献存在实质性差距。需要在医学中的性别不平等领域进行更多的研究,以改善妇女在医学领域的代表性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信