Practical Considerations with Using Mobile Phone Survey Incentives: Experiences in Ghana and Tanzania

B. Leo, R. Morello
{"title":"Practical Considerations with Using Mobile Phone Survey Incentives: Experiences in Ghana and Tanzania","authors":"B. Leo, R. Morello","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2841010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As mobile phone surveys are gaining popularity among researchers and practitioners in international development, one primary challenge is improving survey response and completion rates. A common solution is to provide monetary compensation to respondents. This paper reports on our experience with using incentives with a mobile phone survey conducted in Ghana and Tanzania in June 2015. We find that extrinsic incentives – transfers of airtime – improve survey completion rates by roughly 6 to 8 percentage points. We also find that an SMS notification, aimed at increasing intrinsic motivation to complete the survey, has a comparable positive effect. Considering three levels of compensation (airtime transfers), we find that the supply curve of completed surveys appears to be fairly inelastic. In other words, small amounts of incentives have a similar effect as larger incentives. We also find little evidence of the extrinsic incentives skewing the demographics of the completed samples. However, we do find some evidence that the SMS treatment may have skewed the sample toward wealthier and more educated respondents. Finally, we found that the cost per completed response is not substantially less for every incentive or combination of incentives, compared to the group that did not receive any incentives. Considering these results, we would recommend the consideration of modest monetary compensation as a way of increasing response and completion rates. Nonetheless, a complete lack of extrinsic incentives may remain the most cost effective way to gather completed responses without any associated risk of skewing the survey sample. However, if higher completion rates are desired, a small monetary compensation would be most cost effective with lower risks of biasing the completed sample.","PeriodicalId":446975,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Survey Methods (Topic)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Survey Methods (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2841010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As mobile phone surveys are gaining popularity among researchers and practitioners in international development, one primary challenge is improving survey response and completion rates. A common solution is to provide monetary compensation to respondents. This paper reports on our experience with using incentives with a mobile phone survey conducted in Ghana and Tanzania in June 2015. We find that extrinsic incentives – transfers of airtime – improve survey completion rates by roughly 6 to 8 percentage points. We also find that an SMS notification, aimed at increasing intrinsic motivation to complete the survey, has a comparable positive effect. Considering three levels of compensation (airtime transfers), we find that the supply curve of completed surveys appears to be fairly inelastic. In other words, small amounts of incentives have a similar effect as larger incentives. We also find little evidence of the extrinsic incentives skewing the demographics of the completed samples. However, we do find some evidence that the SMS treatment may have skewed the sample toward wealthier and more educated respondents. Finally, we found that the cost per completed response is not substantially less for every incentive or combination of incentives, compared to the group that did not receive any incentives. Considering these results, we would recommend the consideration of modest monetary compensation as a way of increasing response and completion rates. Nonetheless, a complete lack of extrinsic incentives may remain the most cost effective way to gather completed responses without any associated risk of skewing the survey sample. However, if higher completion rates are desired, a small monetary compensation would be most cost effective with lower risks of biasing the completed sample.
使用手机调查激励的实际考虑:加纳和坦桑尼亚的经验
随着移动电话调查在国际发展领域的研究人员和从业人员中越来越受欢迎,一个主要的挑战是提高调查的回应率和完成率。一个常见的解决方案是向应答者提供货币补偿。本文报告了我们在2015年6月在加纳和坦桑尼亚进行的一项手机调查中使用激励措施的经验。我们发现,外部激励——通话时间的转移——将调查完成率提高了大约6到8个百分点。我们还发现,旨在增加完成调查的内在动机的短信通知具有类似的积极效果。考虑三个补偿水平(通话时间转移),我们发现完成调查的供给曲线似乎相当无弹性。换句话说,少量的激励与较大的激励具有相似的效果。我们也发现很少有证据表明外部激励会扭曲完成样本的人口统计数据。然而,我们确实发现了一些证据,表明短信治疗可能使样本向富裕和受教育程度更高的受访者倾斜。最后,我们发现,与没有接受任何激励的小组相比,每个完成回答的成本在每种激励或组合激励下并没有显著减少。考虑到这些结果,我们建议考虑适度的货币补偿,作为提高响应和完成率的一种方式。尽管如此,完全缺乏外部激励可能仍然是收集完整回答的最具成本效益的方式,而不会有任何扭曲调查样本的相关风险。然而,如果期望更高的完成率,小额货币补偿将是最具成本效益的,并且降低了完成样本偏差的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信