Automatic Forecasting of Volcanoes Eruption Time

Abdulrahman Hussien Mustafa, Farah Mahmoud AbdelMoneim, Magy Gamal Matta, Toka Ossama Barghash, W. Gomaa
{"title":"Automatic Forecasting of Volcanoes Eruption Time","authors":"Abdulrahman Hussien Mustafa, Farah Mahmoud AbdelMoneim, Magy Gamal Matta, Toka Ossama Barghash, W. Gomaa","doi":"10.1109/IMCOM53663.2022.9721804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detecting volcanic eruptions before they occur is a significant issue that has traditionally proved to be challenging. However, it is an interesting concern because of its great potential in saving millions of lives by accurately forecasting the eruption time of volcanoes in the proximity of the inhabited areas, which would provide additional time and facilitate the evacuation processes of people early enough before the catastrophe. In order to forecast the eruption of volcanoes, 10 sensors were mounted around 4431 volcanoes to monitor the eruption time. The goal is to estimate the time of the eruption of another 4520 volcanoes in the coming years. Now that we have established the problem, our approach is formulated using various regression models of machine learning to see the best solution for prediction. These are: Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Convolution Neural Network (CNN), and Long ShortTerm Memory (LSTM). We used the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) as our loss function as well as performance metric, since the time to erupt values are large, the loss will be as well. We have labeled data for training and validation, and unlabeled data for testing. The best unlabeled loss is 6,042,665 belongs to CNN model. Finally, we analyzed the results and compared between the four models and found that RF doesn’t work well with noisy data. On the other hand LSTM, ANN, and CNN have nearly the same behaviour but the latter gave better results.","PeriodicalId":367038,"journal":{"name":"2022 16th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 16th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM53663.2022.9721804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detecting volcanic eruptions before they occur is a significant issue that has traditionally proved to be challenging. However, it is an interesting concern because of its great potential in saving millions of lives by accurately forecasting the eruption time of volcanoes in the proximity of the inhabited areas, which would provide additional time and facilitate the evacuation processes of people early enough before the catastrophe. In order to forecast the eruption of volcanoes, 10 sensors were mounted around 4431 volcanoes to monitor the eruption time. The goal is to estimate the time of the eruption of another 4520 volcanoes in the coming years. Now that we have established the problem, our approach is formulated using various regression models of machine learning to see the best solution for prediction. These are: Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Convolution Neural Network (CNN), and Long ShortTerm Memory (LSTM). We used the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) as our loss function as well as performance metric, since the time to erupt values are large, the loss will be as well. We have labeled data for training and validation, and unlabeled data for testing. The best unlabeled loss is 6,042,665 belongs to CNN model. Finally, we analyzed the results and compared between the four models and found that RF doesn’t work well with noisy data. On the other hand LSTM, ANN, and CNN have nearly the same behaviour but the latter gave better results.
火山喷发时间的自动预报
在火山爆发之前进行探测是一个重大问题,传统上被证明是具有挑战性的。然而,这是一个有趣的问题,因为它有巨大的潜力,可以通过准确预测居民区附近火山的喷发时间来挽救数百万人的生命,这将在灾难发生之前提供额外的时间并促进人们的撤离过程。为了预测火山喷发,在4431座火山周围安装了10个传感器,以监测火山喷发时间。其目标是估计未来几年另外4520座火山喷发的时间。现在我们已经确定了问题,我们的方法是使用各种机器学习的回归模型来制定预测的最佳解决方案。它们是:随机森林(RF)、人工神经网络(ANN)、卷积神经网络(CNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)。我们使用平均绝对误差(MAE)作为损失函数和性能指标,因为爆发值的时间很大,损失也会很大。我们有用于训练和验证的标记数据,以及用于测试的未标记数据。最好的未标记损失是6042665,属于CNN模型。最后,我们对四种模型的结果进行了分析和比较,发现射频对有噪声数据的处理效果并不好。另一方面,LSTM、ANN和CNN具有几乎相同的行为,但后者给出了更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信