How aspects of similar datasets can impact distributional models

Isabella Maria Alonso Gomes, N. T. Roman
{"title":"How aspects of similar datasets can impact distributional models","authors":"Isabella Maria Alonso Gomes, N. T. Roman","doi":"10.5753/eniac.2022.227085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributional models have become popular due to the abstractions that allowed their immediate use, with good results and little implementation effort when compared to precursor models. Given their presumed high level of generalization it would be expected that good and similar results would be found in data sets sharing the same nature and purpose. However, this is not always the case. In this work, we present the results of the application of BERTimbau in two related data sets, built for the task of Semantic Similarity identification, with the goal of detecting redundancy in text. Results showed that there are considerable differences in accuracy between the data sets. We explore aspects of the data sets that could explain why accuracy results are different across them.","PeriodicalId":165095,"journal":{"name":"Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2022)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/eniac.2022.227085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distributional models have become popular due to the abstractions that allowed their immediate use, with good results and little implementation effort when compared to precursor models. Given their presumed high level of generalization it would be expected that good and similar results would be found in data sets sharing the same nature and purpose. However, this is not always the case. In this work, we present the results of the application of BERTimbau in two related data sets, built for the task of Semantic Similarity identification, with the goal of detecting redundancy in text. Results showed that there are considerable differences in accuracy between the data sets. We explore aspects of the data sets that could explain why accuracy results are different across them.
相似数据集的各个方面如何影响分布模型
分布式模型已经变得流行,因为它的抽象允许它们立即使用,与前身模型相比,它的效果很好,实现的工作量很少。鉴于它们假定的高度泛化,可以预期在具有相同性质和目的的数据集中会发现良好和类似的结果。然而,情况并非总是如此。在这项工作中,我们展示了BERTimbau在两个相关数据集上的应用结果,这两个数据集是为语义相似度识别任务而构建的,目的是检测文本中的冗余。结果表明,数据集之间存在相当大的准确性差异。我们探讨了数据集的各个方面,这些方面可以解释为什么它们之间的准确性结果不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信