{"title":"A Century of Neglect: John Henry Newman and T. S. Eliot's \"Tradition and the Individual Talent\"","authors":"L. Oser","doi":"10.1353/SLI.2016.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unexpected obstacle to our juxtaposition of these two authors is that Newman does not answer that illustrious roll call, the index of Donald Gallup’s T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography. Eliot never devoted a single essay to him. What could be the cause of so protracted a silence? Certainly, it was not lack of familiarity. For three straight years, fall and winter, beginning in the fall of 1916, Eliot’s University of London Extension class on “Modern English Literature” devoted a week to Newman. The printed syllabus gives only a tantalizing glimpse of the proceedings: “His temperament, with regard to his change in religious attachment. Reasons for joining the Church of Rome. His thought. Style. Read: Apologia, Idea of a University.” (131)","PeriodicalId":390916,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SLI.2016.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The unexpected obstacle to our juxtaposition of these two authors is that Newman does not answer that illustrious roll call, the index of Donald Gallup’s T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography. Eliot never devoted a single essay to him. What could be the cause of so protracted a silence? Certainly, it was not lack of familiarity. For three straight years, fall and winter, beginning in the fall of 1916, Eliot’s University of London Extension class on “Modern English Literature” devoted a week to Newman. The printed syllabus gives only a tantalizing glimpse of the proceedings: “His temperament, with regard to his change in religious attachment. Reasons for joining the Church of Rome. His thought. Style. Read: Apologia, Idea of a University.” (131)
我们将这两位作者并置的一个意想不到的障碍是,纽曼没有回答唐纳德·盖洛普(Donald Gallup)的《t·s·艾略特参考书目》(T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography)中那个著名的点名。艾略特从未为他写过一篇文章。是什么原因造成这么长时间的沉默呢?当然,这并不是不熟悉。从1916年秋天开始,艾略特在伦敦大学的“现代英国文学”扩展课上花了一个星期的时间来学习纽曼,这是连续三年的秋冬。印刷出来的教学大纲只给了我们一个诱人的一瞥:“他的性情,关于他对宗教信仰的改变。加入罗马教会的原因。他的思想。风格。阅读:《辩辞》,《大学理念》。”(131)