Which visualizations work, for what purpose, for whom?: evaluating visualizations of terrestrial and aquatic systems

J. Cushing, Evan Hayduk, Jerilyn Walley, Kirsten M. Winters, D. Lach, Michael Bailey, Christoph K. Thomas, S. Stafford
{"title":"Which visualizations work, for what purpose, for whom?: evaluating visualizations of terrestrial and aquatic systems","authors":"J. Cushing, Evan Hayduk, Jerilyn Walley, Kirsten M. Winters, D. Lach, Michael Bailey, Christoph K. Thomas, S. Stafford","doi":"10.1145/2442576.2442579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A need for better ecology visualization tools is well documented, and development of these is underway, including our own NSF funded Visualization of Terrestrial and Aquatic Systems (VISTAS) project, now beginning its second of four years. VISTAS' goal is not only to devise visualizations that help ecologists in research and in communicating that research, but also to evaluate the visualizations and software. Thus, we ask \"which visualizations work, for what purpose, and for which audiences,\" and our project involves equal participation of ecologists, computer scientists, and social scientists. We have begun to study visualization use by ecologists, assessed some existing software products, and implemented a prototype. This position paper reports how we apply social science methods in establishing context for VISTAS' evaluation and development. We describe our initial surveys of ecologists and ecology journals to determine current visualization use, outline our visualization evaluation strategies, and in conclusion pose questions critical to the evaluation, deployment, and adoption of VISTAS and VISTAS-like visualizations and software.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2442576.2442579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A need for better ecology visualization tools is well documented, and development of these is underway, including our own NSF funded Visualization of Terrestrial and Aquatic Systems (VISTAS) project, now beginning its second of four years. VISTAS' goal is not only to devise visualizations that help ecologists in research and in communicating that research, but also to evaluate the visualizations and software. Thus, we ask "which visualizations work, for what purpose, and for which audiences," and our project involves equal participation of ecologists, computer scientists, and social scientists. We have begun to study visualization use by ecologists, assessed some existing software products, and implemented a prototype. This position paper reports how we apply social science methods in establishing context for VISTAS' evaluation and development. We describe our initial surveys of ecologists and ecology journals to determine current visualization use, outline our visualization evaluation strategies, and in conclusion pose questions critical to the evaluation, deployment, and adoption of VISTAS and VISTAS-like visualizations and software.
哪些可视化是有效的,为什么目的,为谁?评估陆地和水生系统的可视化
对更好的生态可视化工具的需求是有目可图的,这些工具的开发正在进行中,包括我们自己的NSF资助的陆地和水生系统可视化(vista)项目,现在已经开始了四年中的第二个项目。vista的目标不仅是设计可视化来帮助生态学家进行研究和交流,而且还要评估可视化和软件。因此,我们问“哪些可视化工作,为什么目的,为哪些受众工作”,我们的项目涉及生态学家,计算机科学家和社会科学家的平等参与。我们已经开始研究生态学家对可视化的使用,评估了一些现有的软件产品,并实现了一个原型。这份立场文件报告了我们如何运用社会科学方法来建立远景评估和发展的背景。我们描述了我们对生态学家和生态学期刊的初步调查,以确定当前的可视化使用,概述了我们的可视化评估策略,并在结论中提出了对vista和类似vista的可视化和软件的评估、部署和采用至关重要的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信