Knowledge worlds apart: Aesthetic experience as an epistemological boundary object

Max Liljefors
{"title":"Knowledge worlds apart: Aesthetic experience as an epistemological boundary object","authors":"Max Liljefors","doi":"10.21525/kriterium.24.i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, research into the positive effects of the arts on health and wellbeing has increased in the medical and health sciences, psychology, and sociology. But the traditional aesthetic disciplines, like art history, are largely absent from this research field, in spite of their century-old tradition of studying the arts. Why is that, and how can we bridge the divide between these separate worlds of knowledge? This chapter argues that opposing definitions of knowledge keep them apart, but that they can overcome this obstacle by initiating respectful, negotiating dialouge. As a result, arts and health and the aesthetic disciplines will be able to exchange knowledge, and learn not only about art but also about their own epistemological outlooks","PeriodicalId":144682,"journal":{"name":"Movement of knowledge: Medical humanities perspectives on medicine, science, and experience","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement of knowledge: Medical humanities perspectives on medicine, science, and experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21525/kriterium.24.i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years, research into the positive effects of the arts on health and wellbeing has increased in the medical and health sciences, psychology, and sociology. But the traditional aesthetic disciplines, like art history, are largely absent from this research field, in spite of their century-old tradition of studying the arts. Why is that, and how can we bridge the divide between these separate worlds of knowledge? This chapter argues that opposing definitions of knowledge keep them apart, but that they can overcome this obstacle by initiating respectful, negotiating dialouge. As a result, arts and health and the aesthetic disciplines will be able to exchange knowledge, and learn not only about art but also about their own epistemological outlooks
知识世界的分离:作为认识论边界对象的审美经验
近年来,医学、健康科学、心理学和社会学对艺术对健康和幸福的积极影响的研究有所增加。但是,传统的美学学科,如艺术史,尽管有研究艺术的百年传统,却在很大程度上缺席了这一研究领域。为什么会这样,我们怎样才能弥合这些不同知识世界之间的鸿沟?本章认为,知识的对立定义使他们分开,但他们可以通过发起尊重的协商对话来克服这一障碍。因此,艺术、健康和美学学科将能够交流知识,不仅学习艺术,而且学习自己的认识论观点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信