Lean Construction and Sustainability Through IGLC Community: A Critical Systematic Review of 25 Years of Experience

Saad Sarhan, Amira Elnokaly, C. Pasquire, S. Pretlove
{"title":"Lean Construction and Sustainability Through IGLC Community: A Critical Systematic Review of 25 Years of Experience","authors":"Saad Sarhan, Amira Elnokaly, C. Pasquire, S. Pretlove","doi":"10.24928/2018/0274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been argued that Lean Construction (LC) offers the conceptual basis and the appropriate methods and tools needed for helping the construction industry meet the challenges of sustainable development. Since 1998, a growing body of knowledge has been emerging from the IGLC community, in relation to synergies between LC and Sustainability. Both seek to reduce waste and maximise value, but through different approaches and perspectives. The most common mistake, however, is a tool-focused framework for integration, which overlooks the conceptual differences between these two initiatives. The aim of this study, therefore, is to review the progress made in understanding the linkages and inconsistencies between the two initiatives, through conducting a critical systematic literature review (SLR) and synthesising the findings of ‘LC and Sustainability’ studies published in IGLC conferences over the past 25 years. The findings of the study provide an overview of previous studies about the topic, reveal major limitations in approaches to LC and Sustainable Construction (SC), and divulge significant opportunities for further work that remain unexplored.","PeriodicalId":419313,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

It has been argued that Lean Construction (LC) offers the conceptual basis and the appropriate methods and tools needed for helping the construction industry meet the challenges of sustainable development. Since 1998, a growing body of knowledge has been emerging from the IGLC community, in relation to synergies between LC and Sustainability. Both seek to reduce waste and maximise value, but through different approaches and perspectives. The most common mistake, however, is a tool-focused framework for integration, which overlooks the conceptual differences between these two initiatives. The aim of this study, therefore, is to review the progress made in understanding the linkages and inconsistencies between the two initiatives, through conducting a critical systematic literature review (SLR) and synthesising the findings of ‘LC and Sustainability’ studies published in IGLC conferences over the past 25 years. The findings of the study provide an overview of previous studies about the topic, reveal major limitations in approaches to LC and Sustainable Construction (SC), and divulge significant opportunities for further work that remain unexplored.
通过IGLC社区的精益建设和可持续性:25年经验的关键系统回顾
有人认为,精益建筑(LC)为帮助建筑业应对可持续发展的挑战提供了概念基础和适当的方法和工具。自1998年以来,IGLC社区就LC与可持续性之间的协同作用产生了越来越多的知识。两者都寻求减少浪费和实现价值最大化,但通过不同的方法和观点。然而,最常见的错误是一个以工具为中心的集成框架,它忽略了这两个计划之间的概念差异。因此,本研究的目的是通过进行关键的系统文献综述(SLR)和综合过去25年来在IGLC会议上发表的“LC与可持续性”研究的结果,回顾在理解这两项倡议之间的联系和不一致性方面取得的进展。本研究的结果概述了之前关于该主题的研究,揭示了LC和可持续建筑(SC)方法的主要局限性,并揭示了进一步工作尚未探索的重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信