Performance comparison of three call admission control algorithms in a wireless ad-hoc network

G. Razzano, A. Curcio
{"title":"Performance comparison of three call admission control algorithms in a wireless ad-hoc network","authors":"G. Razzano, A. Curcio","doi":"10.1109/ICCT.2003.1209775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three connection admission control (CAC) algorithms are described and compared via computer simulations by referring to the novel WIND-FLEX wireless LAN, recently developed in the framework of a European IST project. The three CAC solutions employ different strategies to estimate the link utilization, thus giving different performance in terms of number of refused connections and network throughput. The first solution is characterized by reduced complexity by unsatisfactory performance. The other two methods, exhibit much better performance at a reasonable complexity increase. So, they are good candidates for practical applications.","PeriodicalId":237858,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Communication Technology Proceedings, 2003. ICCT 2003.","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Communication Technology Proceedings, 2003. ICCT 2003.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT.2003.1209775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Three connection admission control (CAC) algorithms are described and compared via computer simulations by referring to the novel WIND-FLEX wireless LAN, recently developed in the framework of a European IST project. The three CAC solutions employ different strategies to estimate the link utilization, thus giving different performance in terms of number of refused connections and network throughput. The first solution is characterized by reduced complexity by unsatisfactory performance. The other two methods, exhibit much better performance at a reasonable complexity increase. So, they are good candidates for practical applications.
无线自组网中三种呼叫接纳控制算法的性能比较
本文描述了三种连接允许控制(CAC)算法,并通过计算机模拟对其进行了比较,该算法参考了最近在欧洲IST项目框架内开发的新型WIND-FLEX无线局域网。这三种CAC解决方案采用不同的策略来估计链路利用率,从而在拒绝连接的数量和网络吞吐量方面提供不同的性能。第一种解决方案的特点是由于性能不理想而降低了复杂性。另外两种方法在合理的复杂度增加下表现出更好的性能。因此,它们是实际应用的良好候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信