Towards Hybrid Profiling: Combining Digital Phenotyping with Validated Survey Questions to Balance Data Entry Effort with Predictive Power

Ehsan Hadian Haghighi, Raoul C.Y. Nuijten, Pieter M.E. Van Gorp
{"title":"Towards Hybrid Profiling: Combining Digital Phenotyping with Validated Survey Questions to Balance Data Entry Effort with Predictive Power","authors":"Ehsan Hadian Haghighi, Raoul C.Y. Nuijten, Pieter M.E. Van Gorp","doi":"10.1145/3459104.3459199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tailoring apps based on user traits has attracted tremendous interest in developing mHealth apps and understanding a users’ personality is a key challenge in that context. This challenge is typically addressed via classic surveys, which pose a regrettably high burden on app users. This study aims to reduce the response burden of personality tests by introducing a model for predicting the user personality based on digital footprints of app usage. At the same time, skipping surveys completely turns out to undermine prediction accuracy. Therefore, this paper conceptualizes a hybrid framework that utilizes user event data in combination with surveys that have fewer questions than conventionally. The proposed method demonstrates a promising trade-off between the simplicity of using user event data and the accuracy of the validated survey methods: when applying the hybrid method to a retrospective case study, the accuracy is higher than when using the event data exclusively. Also, the number of survey questions needed is significantly lower. Since this is a novel method, we expect that results will strengthen as larger data sets available over time.","PeriodicalId":142284,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3459104.3459199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tailoring apps based on user traits has attracted tremendous interest in developing mHealth apps and understanding a users’ personality is a key challenge in that context. This challenge is typically addressed via classic surveys, which pose a regrettably high burden on app users. This study aims to reduce the response burden of personality tests by introducing a model for predicting the user personality based on digital footprints of app usage. At the same time, skipping surveys completely turns out to undermine prediction accuracy. Therefore, this paper conceptualizes a hybrid framework that utilizes user event data in combination with surveys that have fewer questions than conventionally. The proposed method demonstrates a promising trade-off between the simplicity of using user event data and the accuracy of the validated survey methods: when applying the hybrid method to a retrospective case study, the accuracy is higher than when using the event data exclusively. Also, the number of survey questions needed is significantly lower. Since this is a novel method, we expect that results will strengthen as larger data sets available over time.
迈向混合分析:结合数字表型与有效的调查问题,以平衡数据输入工作与预测能力
根据用户特征定制应用吸引了开发移动健康应用的巨大兴趣,在这种情况下,理解用户的个性是一个关键挑战。这一挑战通常是通过传统的调查来解决的,这给应用用户带来了沉重的负担。本研究旨在通过引入基于应用使用数字足迹的用户性格预测模型,减轻人格测试的响应负担。与此同时,完全跳过调查结果会破坏预测的准确性。因此,本文概念化了一个混合框架,该框架将用户事件数据与问题比传统调查少的调查相结合。所提出的方法在使用用户事件数据的简单性和经过验证的调查方法的准确性之间证明了一种有希望的权衡:当将混合方法应用于回顾性案例研究时,准确性高于仅使用事件数据时。此外,所需的调查问题数量也大大减少。由于这是一种新颖的方法,我们期望随着时间的推移,随着更大的数据集的可用性,结果将得到加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信