Ultima Ratio-a visual language for argumentation

Michael Schroeder, D. Plewe, A. Raab
{"title":"Ultima Ratio-a visual language for argumentation","authors":"Michael Schroeder, D. Plewe, A. Raab","doi":"10.1109/IV.1999.781604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the third act of Shakespeare's Hamlet, the hero is unsure whether to kill Claudius-the assassin of Hamlet's father-or not. He argues that if he does kill him, Claudius who is praying at that very moment goes to heaven and if he does not kill him Hamlet's father is not revenged. A contradiction. Ultima Ratio aims at formalization and visualization of argumentation for agents. An agent is constituted by a set of arguments and assumptions. Facing a particular world, the agent's believes may be inconsistent triggering a rational monologue to deal with the situation. Formally, we define a framework for argumentation based on extended logic programming under well-founded semantics. The system serves as decision support and is capable of detecting and removing contradictions and deriving conclusions of the agent's arguments. To demonstrate the structure and dynamics of the agent's argumentation, we visualise the process as dynamic construction of proof trees. The paper includes screenshots of the logical engine and the visualisation unit as exhibited at the computer arts exhibition Ars Electronica 98.","PeriodicalId":340240,"journal":{"name":"1999 IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization (Cat. No. PR00210)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1999 IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization (Cat. No. PR00210)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.1999.781604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the third act of Shakespeare's Hamlet, the hero is unsure whether to kill Claudius-the assassin of Hamlet's father-or not. He argues that if he does kill him, Claudius who is praying at that very moment goes to heaven and if he does not kill him Hamlet's father is not revenged. A contradiction. Ultima Ratio aims at formalization and visualization of argumentation for agents. An agent is constituted by a set of arguments and assumptions. Facing a particular world, the agent's believes may be inconsistent triggering a rational monologue to deal with the situation. Formally, we define a framework for argumentation based on extended logic programming under well-founded semantics. The system serves as decision support and is capable of detecting and removing contradictions and deriving conclusions of the agent's arguments. To demonstrate the structure and dynamics of the agent's argumentation, we visualise the process as dynamic construction of proof trees. The paper includes screenshots of the logical engine and the visualisation unit as exhibited at the computer arts exhibition Ars Electronica 98.
终极比例——一种用于论证的视觉语言
在莎士比亚的《哈姆雷特》第三幕中,主人公不确定是否要杀死杀死哈姆雷特父亲的刺客克劳迪斯。他辩称,如果他杀了哈姆雷特,正在祈祷的克劳迪斯就会升入天堂,如果他不杀他,哈姆雷特的父亲就不会得到复仇。一个矛盾。Ultima Ratio旨在将智能体的论证形式化和可视化。一个代理是由一组论证和假设构成的。面对一个特定的世界,代理人的信念可能不一致,从而引发理性的独白来处理这种情况。在形式上,我们定义了一个基于扩展逻辑规划的论证框架。该系统作为决策支持,能够检测和消除矛盾,并得出代理论点的结论。为了演示智能体论证的结构和动态,我们将该过程可视化为证明树的动态构造。本文包括逻辑引擎和可视化单元的截图,在计算机艺术展览Ars Electronica 1998上展出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信