How SVM Can Compensate Logit Based Response Label with Various Characteristics in Predictor? A Simulation Study

M. A. A. Riyadi, D. Prastyo, S. W. Purnami
{"title":"How SVM Can Compensate Logit Based Response Label with Various Characteristics in Predictor? A Simulation Study","authors":"M. A. A. Riyadi, D. Prastyo, S. W. Purnami","doi":"10.1109/ICITEED.2018.8534762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, supervised machine learning methods for classification can be categorized into two approaches, namely parametric and nonparametric. Parametric method has limitations in term of the assumptions must be satisfied. One way to handle this problem is using non parametric approaches. The state of the art classification method is support vector machine (SVM). However, the computational burden of kernel SVM limits its application to large scale datasets that demand high computational time. So, one way to cope the limitation is using ensemble approach that splits the data and applies learning procedure at each subset of data. In this work, the Clustered Support Vector Machine (CSVM) is chosen. So far, the studies of CSVM are limited to theoretical and direct application for real dataset. The application to real dataset directly has a weakness that we never know in detail how various characteristic in predictor affect the learning process. So, it is necessary to do a simulation study to further explore how complex the data, particularly in predictor, that can be handled by SVM and CSVM. There are ten scenarios conducted in this simulation study. The response label is generated using Iogistic regression model with various characteristic setting in predictor in each scenario. Given the true response label is generated using Iogit model, the results of this simulation study show that SVM and CSVM can compensate the performance of Iogistic regression in some scenarios. These results showed that SVM is powerful in classification method regardless how the response label is generated.","PeriodicalId":142523,"journal":{"name":"2018 10th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 10th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2018.8534762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In general, supervised machine learning methods for classification can be categorized into two approaches, namely parametric and nonparametric. Parametric method has limitations in term of the assumptions must be satisfied. One way to handle this problem is using non parametric approaches. The state of the art classification method is support vector machine (SVM). However, the computational burden of kernel SVM limits its application to large scale datasets that demand high computational time. So, one way to cope the limitation is using ensemble approach that splits the data and applies learning procedure at each subset of data. In this work, the Clustered Support Vector Machine (CSVM) is chosen. So far, the studies of CSVM are limited to theoretical and direct application for real dataset. The application to real dataset directly has a weakness that we never know in detail how various characteristic in predictor affect the learning process. So, it is necessary to do a simulation study to further explore how complex the data, particularly in predictor, that can be handled by SVM and CSVM. There are ten scenarios conducted in this simulation study. The response label is generated using Iogistic regression model with various characteristic setting in predictor in each scenario. Given the true response label is generated using Iogit model, the results of this simulation study show that SVM and CSVM can compensate the performance of Iogistic regression in some scenarios. These results showed that SVM is powerful in classification method regardless how the response label is generated.
支持向量机如何补偿预测器中具有不同特征的Logit响应标签?模拟研究
一般来说,用于分类的监督机器学习方法可以分为两种方法,即参数和非参数。参数法在假设条件必须满足方面有局限性。处理这个问题的一种方法是使用非参数方法。目前最先进的分类方法是支持向量机(SVM)。然而,核支持向量机的计算负担限制了其在大规模数据集上的应用。因此,解决这一限制的一种方法是使用集成方法,将数据拆分并在每个数据子集上应用学习过程。本文选择了聚类支持向量机(CSVM)。到目前为止,CSVM的研究仅限于理论和实际数据集的直接应用。直接应用于实际数据集有一个缺点,即我们无法详细了解预测器中的各种特征如何影响学习过程。因此,有必要进行仿真研究,以进一步探索SVM和CSVM可以处理的复杂数据,特别是预测器中的数据。在这个模拟研究中进行了十个场景。在每个场景中,使用逻辑回归模型在预测器中设置各种特征来生成响应标签。在使用Iogit模型生成真实响应标签的情况下,本仿真研究的结果表明,SVM和CSVM在某些情况下可以补偿Iogit回归的性能。这些结果表明,无论如何生成响应标签,支持向量机在分类方法上都是强大的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信