QoE Models in the Wild: Comparing Video QoE Models Using a Crowdsourced Data Set

Anna-Magdalena Seufert, Florian Wamser, D. Yarish, Hunter Macdonald, T. Hossfeld
{"title":"QoE Models in the Wild: Comparing Video QoE Models Using a Crowdsourced Data Set","authors":"Anna-Magdalena Seufert, Florian Wamser, D. Yarish, Hunter Macdonald, T. Hossfeld","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX51781.2021.9465422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdsourced measurements solve the problem of being able to assess the performance of a communication network from an end-user perspective, but the new characteristics of the data pose new challenges for QoE modeling. In contrast to existing laboratory or network measurements, this type of measurement at the end user device primarily involves taking a large number of short sample measurements, which, however, are rich in measured parameters, including many user-, application-, and device-related parameters. To test the applicability and to facilitate the integration of such data, we applied four QoE models from the literature to 290k worldwide video streaming measurements from a commercial data set from August to October 2020. In this work, we will therefore first describe the crowdsourcing video streaming data set to provide insights into the properties of video streaming KPIs in the real world. Second, we run four popular QoE models using this data set, compare the resulting QoE scores, and derive the impact of individual KPIs for each model. We show that the models assess the QoE at least differently, but sometimes with contradicting statements. Reading this paper, it becomes evident that more work and subjective studies, based on real-world data like the one we have shown, are needed to extend the current QoE models.","PeriodicalId":160378,"journal":{"name":"2021 13th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 13th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX51781.2021.9465422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Crowdsourced measurements solve the problem of being able to assess the performance of a communication network from an end-user perspective, but the new characteristics of the data pose new challenges for QoE modeling. In contrast to existing laboratory or network measurements, this type of measurement at the end user device primarily involves taking a large number of short sample measurements, which, however, are rich in measured parameters, including many user-, application-, and device-related parameters. To test the applicability and to facilitate the integration of such data, we applied four QoE models from the literature to 290k worldwide video streaming measurements from a commercial data set from August to October 2020. In this work, we will therefore first describe the crowdsourcing video streaming data set to provide insights into the properties of video streaming KPIs in the real world. Second, we run four popular QoE models using this data set, compare the resulting QoE scores, and derive the impact of individual KPIs for each model. We show that the models assess the QoE at least differently, but sometimes with contradicting statements. Reading this paper, it becomes evident that more work and subjective studies, based on real-world data like the one we have shown, are needed to extend the current QoE models.
野外QoE模型:使用众包数据集比较视频QoE模型
众包测量解决了能够从最终用户的角度评估通信网络性能的问题,但是数据的新特征给QoE建模带来了新的挑战。与现有的实验室或网络测量相比,这种在终端用户设备上的测量主要涉及进行大量的短样本测量,然而,这些测量参数丰富,包括许多与用户、应用和设备相关的参数。为了测试其适用性并促进这些数据的整合,我们将文献中的四个QoE模型应用于2020年8月至10月商业数据集的290k全球视频流测量。因此,在这项工作中,我们将首先描述众包视频流数据集,以提供对现实世界中视频流kpi属性的见解。其次,我们使用该数据集运行四种流行的QoE模型,比较得到的QoE分数,并得出每个模型的单个kpi的影响。我们表明,这些模型对QoE的评估至少是不同的,但有时会有相互矛盾的陈述。阅读这篇论文,很明显,需要更多的工作和主观研究(基于我们所展示的真实世界数据)来扩展当前的QoE模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书