{"title":"A Critical Empirical Study of Three Electricity Spot Price Models","authors":"F. Benth, Ruediger Kiesel, A. Nazarova","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2214973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conduct an empirical analysis of three recently proposed and widely used models for electricity spot price process. The first model, called the jump-diffusion model, was proposed by Cartea and Figueroa (2005), and is a one-factor mean-reversion jump-diffusion model, adjusted to incorporate the most important characteristics of electricity prices. The second model, called the threshold model, was proposed by Roncoroni (2002) and further developed by Geman and Roncoroni (2006), and is an exponential Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process driven by a Brownian motion and a state-dependent compound Poisson process. It is designed to capture both statistical and pathwise properties of electricity spot prices. The third model, called the factor model, was proposed by Benth et al. (2007). It is an additive linear model, where the price dynamics is a superposition of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes driven by subordinators to ensure positivity of the prices. It separates the modelling of spikes and base components. We calibrate all three models to German spot price data. Besides employing techniques similar to those used in the original papers we adopt the prediction-based estimating function technique (Sorensen, 2000) and the filtering technique (Meyer-Brandis and Tankov, 2008). We critically compare the properties and the estimation of the three models and discuss several shortcomings and possible improvements. Besides analysing the spot price behaviour, we compute forward prices and risk premia for all three models for various German forward data and identify the key forward price drivers.","PeriodicalId":378972,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Swaps & Forwards (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"101","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Swaps & Forwards (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2214973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 101
Abstract
We conduct an empirical analysis of three recently proposed and widely used models for electricity spot price process. The first model, called the jump-diffusion model, was proposed by Cartea and Figueroa (2005), and is a one-factor mean-reversion jump-diffusion model, adjusted to incorporate the most important characteristics of electricity prices. The second model, called the threshold model, was proposed by Roncoroni (2002) and further developed by Geman and Roncoroni (2006), and is an exponential Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process driven by a Brownian motion and a state-dependent compound Poisson process. It is designed to capture both statistical and pathwise properties of electricity spot prices. The third model, called the factor model, was proposed by Benth et al. (2007). It is an additive linear model, where the price dynamics is a superposition of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes driven by subordinators to ensure positivity of the prices. It separates the modelling of spikes and base components. We calibrate all three models to German spot price data. Besides employing techniques similar to those used in the original papers we adopt the prediction-based estimating function technique (Sorensen, 2000) and the filtering technique (Meyer-Brandis and Tankov, 2008). We critically compare the properties and the estimation of the three models and discuss several shortcomings and possible improvements. Besides analysing the spot price behaviour, we compute forward prices and risk premia for all three models for various German forward data and identify the key forward price drivers.
我们对最近提出和广泛使用的三个电力现货价格过程模型进行了实证分析。第一个模型称为跳跃-扩散模型,由Cartea和Figueroa(2005)提出,是一个单因素均值回归跳跃-扩散模型,调整后纳入了电价的最重要特征。第二个模型称为阈值模型,由Roncoroni(2002)提出,并由Geman和Roncoroni(2006)进一步发展,它是一个由布朗运动和状态相关的复合泊松过程驱动的指数Ornstein-Uhlenbeck过程。它旨在捕捉电力现货价格的统计属性和路径属性。第三种模型称为因子模型,由Benth等人(2007)提出。这是一个可加性线性模型,其中价格动态是由下级驱动的Ornstein-Uhlenbeck过程的叠加,以确保价格的积极性。它分离了尖峰和基础组件的建模。我们根据德国现货价格数据校准了这三个模型。除了采用与原始论文中使用的技术类似的技术外,我们还采用了基于预测的估计函数技术(Sorensen, 2000)和滤波技术(Meyer-Brandis and Tankov, 2008)。我们批判性地比较了这三种模型的性质和估计,并讨论了一些缺点和可能的改进。除了分析现货价格行为外,我们还计算了所有三个模型的各种德国远期数据的远期价格和风险溢价,并确定了关键的远期价格驱动因素。