Is the Brain a Digital Computer

J. Searle
{"title":"Is the Brain a Digital Computer","authors":"J. Searle","doi":"10.5840/APAPA2013194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I will be addressing 1 and not 2 or 3. I think 2 can be decisively answered in the negative. Since programs are defined purely formally or syntactically and since minds have an intrinsic mental content, it follows immediately that the program by itself cannot constitute the mind. The formal syntax of the program does not by itself guarantee the presence of mental contents. I showed this a decade ago in the Chinese Room Argument (Searle,1980). A computer, me for example, could run the steps in the program for some mental capacity, such as understanding Chinese, without understanding a word of Chinese. The argument rests on the simple logical truth that syntax is not the same as, nor is it by itself sufficient for, semantics. So the answer to the second question is obviously \"No\".","PeriodicalId":443144,"journal":{"name":"The American Philosophical Association Centennial Series","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"273","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Philosophical Association Centennial Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/APAPA2013194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 273

Abstract

I will be addressing 1 and not 2 or 3. I think 2 can be decisively answered in the negative. Since programs are defined purely formally or syntactically and since minds have an intrinsic mental content, it follows immediately that the program by itself cannot constitute the mind. The formal syntax of the program does not by itself guarantee the presence of mental contents. I showed this a decade ago in the Chinese Room Argument (Searle,1980). A computer, me for example, could run the steps in the program for some mental capacity, such as understanding Chinese, without understanding a word of Chinese. The argument rests on the simple logical truth that syntax is not the same as, nor is it by itself sufficient for, semantics. So the answer to the second question is obviously "No".
大脑是一台数字计算机吗
我将处理1,而不是2或3。我认为可以肯定地回答是否定的。既然程序是纯粹形式上或句法上定义的,既然心灵有内在的精神意旨,那么立即可以得出结论,程序本身不能构成心灵。程序的形式语法本身并不能保证心智内容的存在。我在十年前的“中文房间论证”(Searle,1980)中展示了这一点。以我为例,一台电脑可以在不懂中文的情况下运行程序中的步骤,以提高一些脑力,比如理解中文。这个论点建立在一个简单的逻辑真理之上,即语法不等同于语义,它本身也不足以满足语义。所以第二个问题的答案显然是否定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信