Upper Cervical Spine Injuries

W. Hsu, K. Sonn
{"title":"Upper Cervical Spine Injuries","authors":"W. Hsu, K. Sonn","doi":"10.1097/01.CSS.0000461722.73786.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"anterior; type II, longitudinal; and type III, posterior.6 Diagnosis of occipitocervical dislocation can be made on a plain radiograph of the lateral cervical spine using the Powers ratio7 and Harris rule of 12 (Table 1).8,9 Although other measurements have been proposed,10-14 these remain the most commonly used clinical tools for diagnosis. In their study, Harris et al9 noted that a Powers ratio was not measurable in 17 of 37 cases, and that even when evaluated, it failed to detect 40% of injuries. Other authors5,15 have endorsed the use of the Harris measurements for diagnosis of atlanto-occipital dislocation injury. In a recent literature review, Theodore et al4 analyzed 105 atlanto-occipital dislocations to assess the various methods of diagnosing these injuries. They concluded that using lateral radiographs, the Harris method described above provides the most sensitive method for diagnosis. However, because this method only had a sensitivity of 50.5% on plain radiographs, the authors suggested that additional images with CT or MRI be obtained when atlanto-occipital dislocation is suspected. Although atlanto-occipital dissociation injuries result from high-energy mechanisms, other injuries are often present, including skull fracture; spinal cord transection; occipital condyle fracture; atlas fracture; atlantoaxial dislocation; lower cervical spine fracture; vertebral artery injury; subarachnoid F ractures involving the upper cervical spine can be caused by traumatic incidents such as a motor vehicle accident or fall from a height. These fractures can be associated with other injuries and lead to significant disability if there is delayed recognition or inadequate treatment. Although protocols and treatment algorithms are becoming more prevalent, there is still debate as to the best methods for diagnosis and treatment of injuries in this area. We review the most current evidence in the literature to help develop and standardize approaches to fractures in the upper cervical spine that will decrease morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":209002,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Spine Surgery","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CSS.0000461722.73786.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

anterior; type II, longitudinal; and type III, posterior.6 Diagnosis of occipitocervical dislocation can be made on a plain radiograph of the lateral cervical spine using the Powers ratio7 and Harris rule of 12 (Table 1).8,9 Although other measurements have been proposed,10-14 these remain the most commonly used clinical tools for diagnosis. In their study, Harris et al9 noted that a Powers ratio was not measurable in 17 of 37 cases, and that even when evaluated, it failed to detect 40% of injuries. Other authors5,15 have endorsed the use of the Harris measurements for diagnosis of atlanto-occipital dislocation injury. In a recent literature review, Theodore et al4 analyzed 105 atlanto-occipital dislocations to assess the various methods of diagnosing these injuries. They concluded that using lateral radiographs, the Harris method described above provides the most sensitive method for diagnosis. However, because this method only had a sensitivity of 50.5% on plain radiographs, the authors suggested that additional images with CT or MRI be obtained when atlanto-occipital dislocation is suspected. Although atlanto-occipital dissociation injuries result from high-energy mechanisms, other injuries are often present, including skull fracture; spinal cord transection; occipital condyle fracture; atlas fracture; atlantoaxial dislocation; lower cervical spine fracture; vertebral artery injury; subarachnoid F ractures involving the upper cervical spine can be caused by traumatic incidents such as a motor vehicle accident or fall from a height. These fractures can be associated with other injuries and lead to significant disability if there is delayed recognition or inadequate treatment. Although protocols and treatment algorithms are becoming more prevalent, there is still debate as to the best methods for diagnosis and treatment of injuries in this area. We review the most current evidence in the literature to help develop and standardize approaches to fractures in the upper cervical spine that will decrease morbidity and mortality.
上颈椎损伤
前;II型,纵向;III型,后侧枕颈脱位的诊断可以在侧位颈椎平片上使用Powers比率7和Harris规则12(表1)。尽管也提出了其他测量方法10-14,但这些仍然是最常用的临床诊断工具。在他们的研究中,Harris等人9指出,在37个案例中有17个无法测量power ratio,即使进行评估,也无法检测出40%的损伤。其他作者[5,15]支持使用Harris测量法诊断寰枕脱位损伤。在最近的一篇文献综述中,Theodore等人分析了105例寰枕脱位,以评估诊断这些损伤的各种方法。他们得出结论,使用侧位x线片,上述Harris方法提供了最敏感的诊断方法。然而,由于该方法在x线平片上的灵敏度仅为50.5%,因此作者建议,当怀疑寰枕脱位时,应进行额外的CT或MRI检查。虽然寰枕分离性损伤是由高能机制引起的,但也经常存在其他损伤,包括颅骨骨折;脊髓横断;枕髁骨折;阿特拉斯断裂;atlantoaxial错位;下颈椎骨折;椎动脉损伤;涉及上颈椎的蛛网膜下腔骨折可由创伤性事件引起,如机动车事故或从高处坠落。这些骨折可能与其他损伤相关,如果认识迟缓或治疗不充分,可能导致严重的残疾。尽管协议和治疗算法变得越来越普遍,但关于该领域损伤的最佳诊断和治疗方法仍存在争议。我们回顾了文献中最新的证据,以帮助制定和规范治疗上颈椎骨折的方法,从而降低发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信