Models for research in art, design, and the creative industries

Rae A. Earnshaw, S. Liggett, Stuart Cunningham, E. Thompson, Peter S. Excell, K. Heald
{"title":"Models for research in art, design, and the creative industries","authors":"Rae A. Earnshaw, S. Liggett, Stuart Cunningham, E. Thompson, Peter S. Excell, K. Heald","doi":"10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in art and design involves the knowledge and understanding associated with creative works. Practice-led research is also an integral part of art and design. All these areas have been subject to ongoing discussion and debate. One of the current challenges is to produce models that facilitate and enable the development and advancement of research within art and design. However, these models must also synchronise with institutional, national and international frameworks for research development, evaluation, and assessment. The latter can have implications for faculty advancement and also formulaic allocations of research funding across the sector. Practice-led and practice-based research have also generated substantial discussion in terms of seeking a consensus on what is appropriate for developmental purposes and academic assessment. In addition, this area also needs evaluation methods which are fair and consistent across different types of practice. The current situation is that works in these areas are assessed, various types of metric are compared and evaluated, and a proposal is made for the inclusion of metrics alongside the development and use of research models for the development of research. It is argued that deeper analyses of, and more enlightened interdisciplinary approaches to, this are clearly needed.","PeriodicalId":161782,"journal":{"name":"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research in art and design involves the knowledge and understanding associated with creative works. Practice-led research is also an integral part of art and design. All these areas have been subject to ongoing discussion and debate. One of the current challenges is to produce models that facilitate and enable the development and advancement of research within art and design. However, these models must also synchronise with institutional, national and international frameworks for research development, evaluation, and assessment. The latter can have implications for faculty advancement and also formulaic allocations of research funding across the sector. Practice-led and practice-based research have also generated substantial discussion in terms of seeking a consensus on what is appropriate for developmental purposes and academic assessment. In addition, this area also needs evaluation methods which are fair and consistent across different types of practice. The current situation is that works in these areas are assessed, various types of metric are compared and evaluated, and a proposal is made for the inclusion of metrics alongside the development and use of research models for the development of research. It is argued that deeper analyses of, and more enlightened interdisciplinary approaches to, this are clearly needed.
艺术、设计和创意产业的研究模式
艺术与设计的研究涉及与创造性作品相关的知识和理解。以实践为主导的研究也是艺术与设计的一个组成部分。所有这些领域一直在进行讨论和辩论。当前的挑战之一是产生促进和实现艺术和设计研究的发展和进步的模型。然而,这些模型还必须与研究开发、评估和评估的机构、国家和国际框架同步。后者可能会影响教师的进步,也会影响整个行业研究经费的公式化分配。以实践为主导和以实践为基础的研究也产生了大量的讨论,以寻求对发展目的和学术评估适当的共识。此外,这一领域还需要在不同类型的实践中保持公平和一致的评估方法。目前的情况是对这些领域的工作进行评估,对各种类型的度量进行比较和评估,并提出了将度量与研究模型的开发和使用一起纳入研究发展的建议。有人认为,这显然需要更深入的分析和更开明的跨学科方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信