Teachers' Identity Work in a Professional Facebook Group

Mona Lundin, Annika Lantz-Andersson, Thomas Hillman
{"title":"Teachers' Identity Work in a Professional Facebook Group","authors":"Mona Lundin, Annika Lantz-Andersson, Thomas Hillman","doi":"10.28945/4540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate posts that deviate from the norm by receiving many more comments than likes in a teacher thematic Facebook (FB) group.\n\nBackground: Social media sites are currently becoming standard tools for professional practices. Swedish teachers use thematic FB groups as a platform for professional learning. \n\nMethodology: Data from a large teacher FB group over a three-year period have been collected using programmatic approaches. The interactions have been analysed through a three-phased process: (1) meta-data selection criteria and computational analysis to identify in-depth discussions, (2) content selection criteria, and (3) interaction analysis of selected threads.\n\nContribution: FB discussions provide a platform for teachers for sharing resources and for emotional and professional support. The support and sharing do not merely constitute explicit requests, but also bring about professional discussions. \n\nFindings: The 79 original posts that significantly deviated from the norm of the group, were formulated as questions and/or requests, which implies that they were designed to attract comments and not only likes. The original posts were organized around four themes: (1a) functionally motivated technical features, (1b) instructionally motivated technical features, (2) pedagogical ideas and premises, and (3) sharing. The nature of these unusual threads was that teachers used the thematic FB-group to share teaching material and resources as well as to give and receive emotional and professional support. Such sharing and support meant a transformation from working in isolation to finding a professional community. In the discussion threads the teachers displayed a variety of identities, such as active and engaged teacher, a thematic expert, or a central group member. \n\nRecommendations for Practitioners: In terms of practical implications, teachers’ competencies towards using social media platforms for collective and constructive discussions need to be strengthened. The challenge is to promote more teachers to partake in challenging such group norms in such groups so that discussions characterised by openness, debate, and constructive criticism are established. \n\nRecommendation for Researchers: It is vital to empirically investigate teachers’ online interactions as new types of collegial discussions that, while rich, could be seen as valuable even if they are unpredictable compared to well-established professional learning efforts. \n\nImpact on Society: This study contributes with knowledge about the impacts of social media platforms as becoming standard tools for all human activities, let alone professional practices.\n\nFuture Research: Additional detailed analysis of teachers’ use of social media platforms for professional purposes are needed as well as methodological competence development with regard to computational approaches such as those employed in this study. \n\n","PeriodicalId":220667,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate posts that deviate from the norm by receiving many more comments than likes in a teacher thematic Facebook (FB) group. Background: Social media sites are currently becoming standard tools for professional practices. Swedish teachers use thematic FB groups as a platform for professional learning. Methodology: Data from a large teacher FB group over a three-year period have been collected using programmatic approaches. The interactions have been analysed through a three-phased process: (1) meta-data selection criteria and computational analysis to identify in-depth discussions, (2) content selection criteria, and (3) interaction analysis of selected threads. Contribution: FB discussions provide a platform for teachers for sharing resources and for emotional and professional support. The support and sharing do not merely constitute explicit requests, but also bring about professional discussions. Findings: The 79 original posts that significantly deviated from the norm of the group, were formulated as questions and/or requests, which implies that they were designed to attract comments and not only likes. The original posts were organized around four themes: (1a) functionally motivated technical features, (1b) instructionally motivated technical features, (2) pedagogical ideas and premises, and (3) sharing. The nature of these unusual threads was that teachers used the thematic FB-group to share teaching material and resources as well as to give and receive emotional and professional support. Such sharing and support meant a transformation from working in isolation to finding a professional community. In the discussion threads the teachers displayed a variety of identities, such as active and engaged teacher, a thematic expert, or a central group member. Recommendations for Practitioners: In terms of practical implications, teachers’ competencies towards using social media platforms for collective and constructive discussions need to be strengthened. The challenge is to promote more teachers to partake in challenging such group norms in such groups so that discussions characterised by openness, debate, and constructive criticism are established. Recommendation for Researchers: It is vital to empirically investigate teachers’ online interactions as new types of collegial discussions that, while rich, could be seen as valuable even if they are unpredictable compared to well-established professional learning efforts. Impact on Society: This study contributes with knowledge about the impacts of social media platforms as becoming standard tools for all human activities, let alone professional practices. Future Research: Additional detailed analysis of teachers’ use of social media platforms for professional purposes are needed as well as methodological competence development with regard to computational approaches such as those employed in this study.
专业Facebook群体中教师的身份认同工作
目的/目的:本研究的目的是调查在教师主题Facebook (FB)小组中,评论比点赞多的帖子偏离了常态。背景:社交媒体网站目前正在成为专业实践的标准工具。瑞典教师利用专题FB小组作为专业学习的平台。方法:使用程序化方法收集了一个大型教师FB组三年的数据。通过三个阶段的过程对交互进行分析:(1)元数据选择标准和计算分析,以确定深入的讨论;(2)内容选择标准;(3)选定线程的交互分析。贡献:FB讨论为教师提供了资源共享、情感支持和专业支持的平台。支持和分享不仅仅是明确的要求,还会带来专业的讨论。研究发现:79条明显偏离小组规范的原创帖子,被表述为问题和/或请求,这意味着它们的目的是吸引评论,而不仅仅是点赞。最初的帖子围绕四个主题进行组织:(1a)功能驱动的技术特征,(1b)教学驱动的技术特征,(2)教学理念和前提,以及(3)分享。这些不同寻常的线程的本质是教师利用主题fb小组分享教材和资源,以及给予和接受情感和专业支持。这种分享和支持意味着从孤立工作到寻找专业社区的转变。在讨论线程中,教师表现出多种身份,如积极投入的教师,专题专家或中心小组成员。对从业者的建议:就实际意义而言,教师使用社交媒体平台进行集体和建设性讨论的能力需要加强。我们面临的挑战是促进更多的教师参与挑战这样的群体规范,从而建立以开放、辩论和建设性批评为特征的讨论。对研究人员的建议:对教师的在线互动作为一种新型的学院讨论进行实证调查是至关重要的,这种讨论虽然丰富,但与成熟的专业学习努力相比,它们是不可预测的,也可以被视为有价值的。对社会的影响:这项研究有助于了解社交媒体平台的影响,因为它已成为所有人类活动的标准工具,更不用说专业实践了。未来研究:需要进一步详细分析教师出于专业目的使用社交媒体平台的情况,以及本研究中使用的计算方法的方法学能力发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信