Politics and Society in Postsocialism

I. Bernik
{"title":"Politics and Society in Postsocialism","authors":"I. Bernik","doi":"10.1080/15579336.1994.11770084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"had to adapt to the new situation by redirecting their attention to the emergence of postsocialist societies. It seems that in many cases they have almost been too eager to take into account new research problems and to forget the old ones; many of the analy ses of the emerging postsocialist societies pay no attention to the \"outdated\" discussions of the developmental perspectives of so cialist societies. This amnesia suggests that both the analytical tools applied in analyses of socialist societies and the results of these analyses have no immediate relevance for understanding the emergence of the postsocialist societies. The social sciences that are studying the emerging postsocialist societies obviously face the same general problem as do the societies themselves they have to begin, in many respects, from scratch. This essay tries to question some aspects of the above-men tioned assumptions. It will try to show that the accumulated knowledge about socialist societies represents a stimulative start ing point for the analysis of the emergent postsocialist societies. This approach by no means implies that there exists a continuity between both types of society; my claim is that by focusing on the substratum on which the new societies grow, both continui ties and discontinuities can be highlighted. That is why, in the first part of the essay, some basic characteristics of socialist soci eties and the prevailing assumptions regarding their developmen 45","PeriodicalId":338704,"journal":{"name":"Toward a European Nation?","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toward a European Nation?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15579336.1994.11770084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

had to adapt to the new situation by redirecting their attention to the emergence of postsocialist societies. It seems that in many cases they have almost been too eager to take into account new research problems and to forget the old ones; many of the analy ses of the emerging postsocialist societies pay no attention to the "outdated" discussions of the developmental perspectives of so cialist societies. This amnesia suggests that both the analytical tools applied in analyses of socialist societies and the results of these analyses have no immediate relevance for understanding the emergence of the postsocialist societies. The social sciences that are studying the emerging postsocialist societies obviously face the same general problem as do the societies themselves they have to begin, in many respects, from scratch. This essay tries to question some aspects of the above-men tioned assumptions. It will try to show that the accumulated knowledge about socialist societies represents a stimulative start ing point for the analysis of the emergent postsocialist societies. This approach by no means implies that there exists a continuity between both types of society; my claim is that by focusing on the substratum on which the new societies grow, both continui ties and discontinuities can be highlighted. That is why, in the first part of the essay, some basic characteristics of socialist soci eties and the prevailing assumptions regarding their developmen 45
后社会主义的政治与社会
必须通过将注意力转向后社会主义社会的出现来适应新的形势。在许多情况下,他们似乎太急于考虑新的研究问题,而忘记了旧的问题;许多对新兴的后社会主义社会的分析没有注意到对这些社会主义社会的发展前景的“过时的”讨论。这种失忆表明,社会主义社会分析中使用的分析工具和这些分析的结果,对于理解后社会主义社会的出现都没有直接的相关性。研究新兴后社会主义社会的社会科学显然面临着与社会本身相同的普遍问题——在许多方面,它们必须从零开始。本文试图对上述假设的某些方面提出质疑。它将试图表明,积累的关于社会主义社会的知识为分析新兴的后社会主义社会提供了一个鼓舞人心的起点。这种做法绝不意味着两种类型的社会之间存在连续性;我的观点是,通过关注新社会赖以成长的基础,连续性和非连续性都可以被突出。这就是为什么在文章的第一部分,社会主义社会的一些基本特征和关于其发展的普遍假设
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信