High performance work practices and employees well-being: The role of work intensification and self-efficacy

Bashar Al-Majali, Mohammad A. Ta’Amnha
{"title":"High performance work practices and employees well-being: The role of work intensification and self-efficacy","authors":"Bashar Al-Majali, Mohammad A. Ta’Amnha","doi":"10.22495/cgfcisrp19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The well-being of healthcare workers is a major concern for healthcare organizations due to their significant impacts on performance and productivity (Ta‘Amnha, Samawi, Bwaliez, & Magableh, 2021). Therefore, healthcare organizations employ various strategies and practices to create and maintain healthy and positive working environments for their workers. In this study, our focus was on the impact of high-performance work practices (HPWPs) on the healthcare workers‘ health and well-being. HPWPs are a collection of several interdependent human resource (HR) practices that are employed to enhance the performance of organizations. Even though there is no consensus pertaining to the components of the HPWPs framework, typically it integrates job autonomy, team working, staff training, performance management, supportive leadership, and other capability-enhancing practices. HPWPs boost positive job attitudes and behaviors in organizations that therefore lead to positive organizational outcomes. However, some research revealed that HPWPs increase the work intensification among International Online Conference (November 25, 2021) ―CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: FUNDAMENTAL AND CHALLENGING ISSUES IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH‖ 114 workers. This is because HPWPs require exerting intense effort from employees that therefore leave them unable sometimes to perform all their jobs‘ requirements effectively. This standpoint receives very limited attention in the literature; therefore this research aims to contribute to filling this gap by examining whether the HPWPs increase employees‘ feeling of work intensification and whether this situation leads to destructive consequences on the employees‘ health and well-being. In addition to the organizational resources, this study focuses also on the role of personal resources (i.e., self-efficacy) on the employees‘ health and well-being. Self-efficacy refers to the individual believing that he or she is able to perform their tasks effectively (Bandura, 1997). We proposed that employees with a high level of self-efficacy are more likely to meet their jobs requirements more effectively and experience less work intensification (Ta‘Amnha, Bwaliez, & Magableh, 2021). We assumed that both organizational resources and personal resources work hand in hand in improving employees‘ experiences. Therefore, we employ two theories to underpin this research and interpret its results including job demand resource model (JD-R model) (Bakker, Demerouti, & Euwema, 2005), and behavioral plasticity theory (Pierce, Gardner, Dunham, & Cummings, 1993). The former assumes that every job has its specific risk factors associated with job stress or burnout. These factors are grouped into two categories namely; job demands and job resources that institute a holistic model that can be adopted to explain several occupational settings regardless of the associated demands and resources. Job demands refer ―to those physical, social, or organizational aspects of the job that require sustained physical or mental effort and are therefore associated with certain physiological and psychological costs‖ (Bakker et al., 2005, p. 170). Whereas job resources refer to ―those physical, psychological, social, or organizational aspects of the job that (a) are functional in achieving work goals, (b) reduce job demands and the associated physiological and psychological costs, or (c) stimulate personal growth and development‖ (Bakker et al., 2005, p. 170). According to the JD-R model, there are several and diverse job resources that represent a buffer for numerous and various job demands. Job demands and job resources in any given organization are determined by the jobs design and characteristics. We assumed that the resource offered by organizations to their employees through HPWPs enhance their well-being and health and their ability to deal with their jobs‘ challenges. The moderating effects of self-efficacy in this study were explained via the behavioral plasticity theory (Pierce et al., 1993). This theory assumes that the changes in individuals‘ behaviors are caused by exposure to external stimuli. According to the behavioral plasticity theory, people with low self-efficacy are more likely to be influenced by the workplaces conditions and circumstances. They are more vulnerable to the lack of organizational supports but more malleable to the increase International Online Conference (November 25, 2021) ―CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: FUNDAMENTAL AND CHALLENGING ISSUES IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH‖ 115 in organizational support (Turban & Keon, 1993). On the other hand, individuals with a high level of self-efficacy are less affected by external influences (Liu, Cho, & Putra, 2017). They are more persistent and determined to reach their goals through a high level of engagement compared with low self-efficacy employees. Thus, they feel less stressed from their demanding work that therefore improves their well-being and protects their health, thus they become more resilient. A quantitative survey was used to collect the research data from the healthcare workers who are working in Jordanian hospitals. The questionnaire was administrated in Arabic. All measures were translated from English to Arabic using a standard translation procedure (i.e., back translation) (Brislin, 1980) to ensure the content validity of the measures. 238 useable surveys were collected through a convenience sampling approach The results of this project revealed the pivotal role of healthcare institutions in enhancing the health and well-being of their workers, and ultimately their performance by offering more support and resources, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. This is because healthcare workers suffer from a high level of stress and anxiety caused by the fear of getting infected, more family pressure, especially after closing schools and nurseries. These pressures may affect their satisfaction at work, and increase the feeling of job burnout that thus impact their performance negatively, therefore offering several sorts of support for those workers enable them to deal with COVID-19 challenges more effectively and experience more satisfaction in their jobs (Ta‘Amnha, Bwaliez, Magableh, Samawi, & Mdanat, 2021). We found that by offering more HPWPs, healthcare workers experience better health and well-being, however, we also found that work intensification may reduce the positive impact of HPWPs. As expected, self-efficacy increases the positive impact of HPWPs on healthcare workers and reduces the impact of work intensification. In conclusion, healthcare organizations can get the best out of their workers by offering them more organizational resources and enhance their personal resources.","PeriodicalId":104718,"journal":{"name":"Corporate governance: Fundamental and challenging issues in scholarly research","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate governance: Fundamental and challenging issues in scholarly research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/cgfcisrp19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The well-being of healthcare workers is a major concern for healthcare organizations due to their significant impacts on performance and productivity (Ta‘Amnha, Samawi, Bwaliez, & Magableh, 2021). Therefore, healthcare organizations employ various strategies and practices to create and maintain healthy and positive working environments for their workers. In this study, our focus was on the impact of high-performance work practices (HPWPs) on the healthcare workers‘ health and well-being. HPWPs are a collection of several interdependent human resource (HR) practices that are employed to enhance the performance of organizations. Even though there is no consensus pertaining to the components of the HPWPs framework, typically it integrates job autonomy, team working, staff training, performance management, supportive leadership, and other capability-enhancing practices. HPWPs boost positive job attitudes and behaviors in organizations that therefore lead to positive organizational outcomes. However, some research revealed that HPWPs increase the work intensification among International Online Conference (November 25, 2021) ―CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: FUNDAMENTAL AND CHALLENGING ISSUES IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH‖ 114 workers. This is because HPWPs require exerting intense effort from employees that therefore leave them unable sometimes to perform all their jobs‘ requirements effectively. This standpoint receives very limited attention in the literature; therefore this research aims to contribute to filling this gap by examining whether the HPWPs increase employees‘ feeling of work intensification and whether this situation leads to destructive consequences on the employees‘ health and well-being. In addition to the organizational resources, this study focuses also on the role of personal resources (i.e., self-efficacy) on the employees‘ health and well-being. Self-efficacy refers to the individual believing that he or she is able to perform their tasks effectively (Bandura, 1997). We proposed that employees with a high level of self-efficacy are more likely to meet their jobs requirements more effectively and experience less work intensification (Ta‘Amnha, Bwaliez, & Magableh, 2021). We assumed that both organizational resources and personal resources work hand in hand in improving employees‘ experiences. Therefore, we employ two theories to underpin this research and interpret its results including job demand resource model (JD-R model) (Bakker, Demerouti, & Euwema, 2005), and behavioral plasticity theory (Pierce, Gardner, Dunham, & Cummings, 1993). The former assumes that every job has its specific risk factors associated with job stress or burnout. These factors are grouped into two categories namely; job demands and job resources that institute a holistic model that can be adopted to explain several occupational settings regardless of the associated demands and resources. Job demands refer ―to those physical, social, or organizational aspects of the job that require sustained physical or mental effort and are therefore associated with certain physiological and psychological costs‖ (Bakker et al., 2005, p. 170). Whereas job resources refer to ―those physical, psychological, social, or organizational aspects of the job that (a) are functional in achieving work goals, (b) reduce job demands and the associated physiological and psychological costs, or (c) stimulate personal growth and development‖ (Bakker et al., 2005, p. 170). According to the JD-R model, there are several and diverse job resources that represent a buffer for numerous and various job demands. Job demands and job resources in any given organization are determined by the jobs design and characteristics. We assumed that the resource offered by organizations to their employees through HPWPs enhance their well-being and health and their ability to deal with their jobs‘ challenges. The moderating effects of self-efficacy in this study were explained via the behavioral plasticity theory (Pierce et al., 1993). This theory assumes that the changes in individuals‘ behaviors are caused by exposure to external stimuli. According to the behavioral plasticity theory, people with low self-efficacy are more likely to be influenced by the workplaces conditions and circumstances. They are more vulnerable to the lack of organizational supports but more malleable to the increase International Online Conference (November 25, 2021) ―CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: FUNDAMENTAL AND CHALLENGING ISSUES IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH‖ 115 in organizational support (Turban & Keon, 1993). On the other hand, individuals with a high level of self-efficacy are less affected by external influences (Liu, Cho, & Putra, 2017). They are more persistent and determined to reach their goals through a high level of engagement compared with low self-efficacy employees. Thus, they feel less stressed from their demanding work that therefore improves their well-being and protects their health, thus they become more resilient. A quantitative survey was used to collect the research data from the healthcare workers who are working in Jordanian hospitals. The questionnaire was administrated in Arabic. All measures were translated from English to Arabic using a standard translation procedure (i.e., back translation) (Brislin, 1980) to ensure the content validity of the measures. 238 useable surveys were collected through a convenience sampling approach The results of this project revealed the pivotal role of healthcare institutions in enhancing the health and well-being of their workers, and ultimately their performance by offering more support and resources, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. This is because healthcare workers suffer from a high level of stress and anxiety caused by the fear of getting infected, more family pressure, especially after closing schools and nurseries. These pressures may affect their satisfaction at work, and increase the feeling of job burnout that thus impact their performance negatively, therefore offering several sorts of support for those workers enable them to deal with COVID-19 challenges more effectively and experience more satisfaction in their jobs (Ta‘Amnha, Bwaliez, Magableh, Samawi, & Mdanat, 2021). We found that by offering more HPWPs, healthcare workers experience better health and well-being, however, we also found that work intensification may reduce the positive impact of HPWPs. As expected, self-efficacy increases the positive impact of HPWPs on healthcare workers and reduces the impact of work intensification. In conclusion, healthcare organizations can get the best out of their workers by offering them more organizational resources and enhance their personal resources.
高绩效工作实践与员工幸福感:工作强化与自我效能的作用
医护人员的福祉是医疗保健组织的主要关注点,因为他们对绩效和生产力有重大影响(Ta 'Amnha, Samawi, Bwaliez, & Magableh, 2021)。因此,医疗保健组织采用各种策略和实践来为其员工创造和维护健康和积极的工作环境。在本研究中,我们的重点是高绩效工作实践(HPWPs)对医护人员的健康和福祉的影响。hpwp是几个相互依赖的人力资源(HR)实践的集合,用于提高组织的绩效。尽管对HPWPs框架的组成部分没有达成共识,但它通常集成了工作自主权、团队合作、员工培训、绩效管理、支持性领导和其他能力增强实践。hpwp在组织中促进积极的工作态度和行为,从而导致积极的组织成果。然而,一些研究表明,hpwp增加了国际在线会议(2021年11月25日)-公司治理:学术研究中的基本和具有挑战性的问题- 114名工人的工作强度。这是因为hpwp需要员工付出巨大的努力,因此有时他们无法有效地完成所有工作要求。这一观点在文献中受到的关注非常有限;因此,本研究旨在通过研究高强度工作计划是否会增加员工的工作强化感,以及这种情况是否会对员工的健康和福祉造成破坏性后果,来填补这一空白。除了组织资源外,本研究还关注了个人资源(即自我效能感)对员工健康和福祉的作用。自我效能感是指个体相信自己能够有效地执行任务(Bandura, 1997)。我们提出,自我效能感高的员工更有可能更有效地满足工作要求,工作强度更低(Ta’amnha, Bwaliez, & Magableh, 2021)。我们假设组织资源和个人资源在改善员工体验方面携手合作。因此,我们采用工作需求资源模型(JD-R模型)(Bakker, Demerouti, & Euwema, 2005)和行为可塑性理论(Pierce, Gardner, Dunham, & Cummings, 1993)两种理论来支撑本研究并解释其结果。前者假设每一份工作都有与工作压力或倦怠相关的特定风险因素。这些因素分为两类,即;工作需求和工作资源建立了一个整体模型,可以用来解释几种职业设置,而不考虑相关的需求和资源。工作需求指的是——工作中那些需要持续的体力或精神努力,因此与某些生理和心理成本相关的体力、社会或组织方面的要求(Bakker et al., 2005, p. 170)。而工作资源是指——工作中那些(a)在实现工作目标方面起作用的、(b)减少工作需求和相关的生理和心理成本的、或(c)促进个人成长和发展的那些生理、心理、社会或组织方面的资源(Bakker et al., 2005, p. 170)。根据JD-R模型,有几种不同的工作资源代表了众多不同工作需求的缓冲。任何组织的工作需求和工作资源都是由工作设计和特点决定的。我们假设组织通过HPWPs向员工提供的资源可以提高他们的福祉和健康,以及他们应对工作挑战的能力。本研究中自我效能感的调节作用由行为可塑性理论解释(Pierce et al., 1993)。该理论假设个体行为的变化是由暴露于外部刺激引起的。根据行为可塑性理论,自我效能感低的人更容易受到工作环境的影响。他们更容易受到缺乏组织支持的影响,但更容易受到国际在线会议(2021年11月25日)的影响-公司治理:学术研究中的基本和具有挑战性的问题115组织支持(Turban & Keon, 1993)。另一方面,自我效能感高的个体受外部影响的影响较小(Liu, Cho, & Putra, 2017)。与低自我效能的员工相比,他们更有毅力和决心通过高水平的投入来实现目标。 因此,他们从高要求的工作中感受到的压力更小,从而改善了他们的福祉,保护了他们的健康,从而变得更有弹性。定量调查用于收集在约旦医院工作的卫生保健工作者的研究数据。调查表以阿拉伯语印发。使用标准的翻译程序(即回译)将所有测量值从英语翻译成阿拉伯语(Brislin, 1980),以确保测量值的内容有效性。该项目的结果揭示了医疗机构通过提供更多支持和资源,特别是在当前COVID-19大流行期间,在提高其员工的健康和福祉,并最终提高其绩效方面的关键作用。这是因为卫生保健工作者承受着高度的压力和焦虑,这是由于害怕被感染,家庭压力更大,特别是在学校和托儿所关闭之后。这些压力可能会影响他们对工作的满意度,并增加工作倦怠的感觉,从而对他们的绩效产生负面影响,因此,为这些工人提供几种支持,使他们能够更有效地应对COVID-19的挑战,并在工作中获得更高的满意度(Ta 'Amnha, Bwaliez, Magableh, Samawi, & Mdanat, 2021)。我们发现,通过提供更多的hpwp,医护人员体验到更好的健康和福祉,然而,我们也发现,工作强度可能会降低hpwp的积极影响。正如预期的那样,自我效能感增加了卫生保健工作者对卫生保健工作者的积极影响,减少了工作强化的影响。总之,医疗保健组织可以通过为员工提供更多的组织资源和增强他们的个人资源来最大限度地发挥员工的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信