Childhood Art in Community Education: Postdevelopmental Learning through Feminist Leadership, Diversity and Pedagogic Invention

Linda Knight
{"title":"Childhood Art in Community Education: Postdevelopmental Learning through Feminist Leadership, Diversity and Pedagogic Invention","authors":"Linda Knight","doi":"10.5040/9781350042575.ch-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter I use community education as an umbrella term to describe learning outside the formal spaces of school and before school settings such as kindergarten and long day care. In using community education I make reference to cultural groups, community playgroups, specialist after school activities, holiday camps, and festivals where children work often in multi-age groups and with flexible attendance with adults who identify as community educators: artists, sportspeople, musicians, librarians, cultural elders and more. I acknowledge that my description takes a first world view of community, replete with particular societal and institutional infrastructures to support the availability of extra-curricular, and/or prior-to-school opportunities, however the chapter will also reference global examples of community education in its different contexts and organisations. \n \nCommunity education is not a recent development, although it is the focus of a growing curiosity about what, how and where children learn, and how that might be thought about through ‘post’ theories including posthumanism, postfoundational, new materialism, and postdevelomentalism. Non-formal pedagogic sites have come into view because they offer ways to think about where education addresses \"the needs of the state, as they are used to mobilise wider political and policy-based discourses around participation, citizenship and engagement.” (Mills & Kraftl 2014, p. 1). As education research expands and diversifies, humanist readings of community education notice, perhaps nervously, that they remain as sites of powerful learning exchange in contrast to formal education which has had its politics strangulated and siphoned through over-standardisation, regulation and surveillancing. Community education, in ‘flying under the radar’ are difficult to control because they remain as sites with contextual particularity and thus with relative political fluidity, and supporting pedagogic and learning invention. \n \nFor Mills & Kraftl (2014) community education has great potency due to the \"everyday and spontaneous learning experiences that vary across different local, national and global contexts.” (Mills & Kraftl 2014, p. 1). In recognition of the rich diversity globally, of community education provision they ask \"how are young people positioned within philosophies of informal education?” (Mills & Kraftl 2014, p. 2). It is this question of positioning and conceptualising that I take on in this chapter. \n \nIn my history as a community artist educator, then as an early childhood education scholar I have observed how, despite the steady creep of regulatory standardisation in early childhood education and care, younger children continue to spend significant amounts of time encountering education in community contexts. Many children across social and demographic contexts attend festivals, weekend events, holiday clubs, cultural gatherings in addition to their regular attendance at more formal learning spaces. My extension question then, is to ask ’How does community education take a postdevelopmental approach to early childhood art? I use my experiences of working as a community artist educator/early childhood education scholar at a large arts festival dedicated to children 0 - 8 years, to suggest how the learning philosophies of community education enable postdevelopmental learning, and support pedagogic invention. \n \nMills, S. & Kraftl, P. (Eds.) (2014) Informal education, childhood and youth: geographies, histories, practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.","PeriodicalId":179460,"journal":{"name":"Postdevelopmental Approaches to Childhood Art","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postdevelopmental Approaches to Childhood Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350042575.ch-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this chapter I use community education as an umbrella term to describe learning outside the formal spaces of school and before school settings such as kindergarten and long day care. In using community education I make reference to cultural groups, community playgroups, specialist after school activities, holiday camps, and festivals where children work often in multi-age groups and with flexible attendance with adults who identify as community educators: artists, sportspeople, musicians, librarians, cultural elders and more. I acknowledge that my description takes a first world view of community, replete with particular societal and institutional infrastructures to support the availability of extra-curricular, and/or prior-to-school opportunities, however the chapter will also reference global examples of community education in its different contexts and organisations. Community education is not a recent development, although it is the focus of a growing curiosity about what, how and where children learn, and how that might be thought about through ‘post’ theories including posthumanism, postfoundational, new materialism, and postdevelomentalism. Non-formal pedagogic sites have come into view because they offer ways to think about where education addresses "the needs of the state, as they are used to mobilise wider political and policy-based discourses around participation, citizenship and engagement.” (Mills & Kraftl 2014, p. 1). As education research expands and diversifies, humanist readings of community education notice, perhaps nervously, that they remain as sites of powerful learning exchange in contrast to formal education which has had its politics strangulated and siphoned through over-standardisation, regulation and surveillancing. Community education, in ‘flying under the radar’ are difficult to control because they remain as sites with contextual particularity and thus with relative political fluidity, and supporting pedagogic and learning invention. For Mills & Kraftl (2014) community education has great potency due to the "everyday and spontaneous learning experiences that vary across different local, national and global contexts.” (Mills & Kraftl 2014, p. 1). In recognition of the rich diversity globally, of community education provision they ask "how are young people positioned within philosophies of informal education?” (Mills & Kraftl 2014, p. 2). It is this question of positioning and conceptualising that I take on in this chapter. In my history as a community artist educator, then as an early childhood education scholar I have observed how, despite the steady creep of regulatory standardisation in early childhood education and care, younger children continue to spend significant amounts of time encountering education in community contexts. Many children across social and demographic contexts attend festivals, weekend events, holiday clubs, cultural gatherings in addition to their regular attendance at more formal learning spaces. My extension question then, is to ask ’How does community education take a postdevelopmental approach to early childhood art? I use my experiences of working as a community artist educator/early childhood education scholar at a large arts festival dedicated to children 0 - 8 years, to suggest how the learning philosophies of community education enable postdevelopmental learning, and support pedagogic invention. Mills, S. & Kraftl, P. (Eds.) (2014) Informal education, childhood and youth: geographies, histories, practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
社区教育中的儿童艺术:通过女权主义领导、多样性和教学发明的发展后学习
在本章中,我使用社区教育作为一个总括术语来描述学校正式空间之外和学校设置(如幼儿园和长期日托)之前的学习。在使用社区教育时,我指的是文化团体、社区游戏小组、专业的课后活动、假日营地和节日,在这些活动中,儿童通常以多年龄群体的形式工作,并且与那些被认为是社区教育者的成年人一起灵活出勤:艺术家、运动员、音乐家、图书管理员、文化长者等等。我承认,我的描述采用了社区的第一世界观,充满了特定的社会和机构基础设施,以支持课外活动和/或入学前机会的可用性,然而,本章也将参考全球不同背景和组织的社区教育实例。社区教育并不是最近才发展起来的,尽管它是人们对儿童学习的内容、方式和地点日益增长的好奇心的焦点,以及如何通过“后”理论(包括后人文主义、后基础主义、新唯物主义和后发展主义)来思考这一点。非正式的教学网站之所以进入人们的视野,是因为它们提供了思考教育如何满足“国家需求”的途径,因为它们被用来动员围绕参与、公民身份和参与的更广泛的政治和基于政策的话语。(Mills & Kraftl 2014,第1页)。随着教育研究的扩展和多样化,社区教育的人文主义解读可能会紧张地注意到,与正规教育相比,它们仍然是强大的学习交流场所,而正规教育的政治被过度标准化、监管和监视所扼杀和抽走。社区教育“在雷达下飞行”是难以控制的,因为它们仍然是具有上下文特殊性的场所,因此具有相对的政治流动性,并支持教学和学习发明。Mills & Kraftl(2014)认为,社区教育具有巨大的潜力,因为“在不同的地方、国家和全球背景下,日常和自发的学习经历各不相同”。(Mills & Kraftl 2014,第1页)。在认识到全球社区教育提供的丰富多样性后,他们问“年轻人在非正式教育哲学中的定位如何?”(Mills & Kraftl 2014,第2页)。我在本章中讨论的就是这个定位和概念化的问题。在我作为社区艺术家教育家和早期儿童教育学者的历史中,我观察到,尽管早期儿童教育和护理的监管标准化稳步发展,但年幼的儿童仍然花费大量时间在社区环境中接受教育。在各种社会和人口背景下,许多儿童除了定期参加更正式的学习场所外,还参加节日、周末活动、假日俱乐部和文化聚会。我的延伸问题是,“社区教育如何对早期儿童艺术采取后发展方法?”我在一个专门为0 - 8岁儿童举办的大型艺术节上担任社区艺术家教育家/幼儿教育学者的经历,表明社区教育的学习理念如何促进后发育学习,并支持教学创新。Mills, S. & Kraftl, P.(主编)(2014)非正规教育,童年和青年:地理,历史,实践。贝辛斯托克,英国:Palgrave Macmillan。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信