Performance Comparison between U-Net Variant Models in Spine Segmentation

Qiyong Zhong, Longfei Zhou, Taoyang Hang, Xiao Yu, Jiantao Wang, Jiasheng Yang, Zijun Zhou, Yukun Quan, Sihan Niu, Yujie Zhu, Zhe Fang, Xinyu Xie
{"title":"Performance Comparison between U-Net Variant Models in Spine Segmentation","authors":"Qiyong Zhong, Longfei Zhou, Taoyang Hang, Xiao Yu, Jiantao Wang, Jiasheng Yang, Zijun Zhou, Yukun Quan, Sihan Niu, Yujie Zhu, Zhe Fang, Xinyu Xie","doi":"10.1109/UV56588.2022.10185445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spine Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial diagnostic technique for illnesses of the spinal cord. The UNET network, the most prominent neural network model for segmenting medical images has opened up new opportunities for spin MRI segmentation as a result of the rapid development of deep-learning algorithms. In this study, we compared the difference between UNet and five other variants (Unet++, Unet+++, Attention-UNet, Dense-UNet, and R2UNet) in performance and efficiency by training and testing them on the same Spine MRI image dataset that contained 200 patients. The results showed that Attention-UNet performed best on the Miou (83.33 percent) and Average dice(89.15 percent) metrics; R2UNet performed best on the Accuracy (97.12 percent) metric. Attention-UNet has the slightest difference between the basic segmentation and the baseline value in terms of segmentation performance. This study could provide a better understanding of different networks on the Spine MRI Segmentation task.","PeriodicalId":211011,"journal":{"name":"2022 6th International Conference on Universal Village (UV)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 6th International Conference on Universal Village (UV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UV56588.2022.10185445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spine Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial diagnostic technique for illnesses of the spinal cord. The UNET network, the most prominent neural network model for segmenting medical images has opened up new opportunities for spin MRI segmentation as a result of the rapid development of deep-learning algorithms. In this study, we compared the difference between UNet and five other variants (Unet++, Unet+++, Attention-UNet, Dense-UNet, and R2UNet) in performance and efficiency by training and testing them on the same Spine MRI image dataset that contained 200 patients. The results showed that Attention-UNet performed best on the Miou (83.33 percent) and Average dice(89.15 percent) metrics; R2UNet performed best on the Accuracy (97.12 percent) metric. Attention-UNet has the slightest difference between the basic segmentation and the baseline value in terms of segmentation performance. This study could provide a better understanding of different networks on the Spine MRI Segmentation task.
U-Net变体模型在脊柱分割中的性能比较
脊柱磁共振成像(MRI)是诊断脊髓疾病的一项重要技术。UNET网络是医学图像分割中最突出的神经网络模型,由于深度学习算法的快速发展,为自旋MRI分割开辟了新的机会。在这项研究中,我们通过在包含200名患者的同一脊柱MRI图像数据集上训练和测试UNet与其他五种变体(unnet++、unnet++、Attention-UNet、Dense-UNet和R2UNet)在性能和效率方面的差异进行了比较。结果显示,Attention-UNet在Miou(83.33%)和Average dice(89.15%)指标上表现最好;R2UNet在准确性(97.12%)指标上表现最好。在分割性能方面,注意- unet在基本分割和基线值之间的差异很小。本研究可以更好地理解不同网络在脊柱MRI分割任务中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信