Contra Heidegger: A Defense of Plato’s “Productionist Metaphysics”

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI:10.5840/EPOCHE201015126
J. Wood
{"title":"Contra Heidegger: A Defense of Plato’s “Productionist Metaphysics”","authors":"J. Wood","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE201015126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper confronts Heidegger's critique of Platonism and defends Plato as a productionist metaphysician. Heidegger misunderstands and abuses Platonic metaphysics. Rather than initiating the reification of being (Sein) in beings (das Seiende) and the subordination of nature to human control, as Heidegger accuses, Plato offers us a non-dogmatic metaphysics of human possibility oriented by and subordinated to being, conceived equally as the good and the beautiful. The relevant production constitutes the ethical counterpart of Platonic metaphysics: it is the responsible bringing of ourselves to \"presence\" in accordance with the measures given in nature, a process that is erotic, progressive, and always on-the-way.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper confronts Heidegger's critique of Platonism and defends Plato as a productionist metaphysician. Heidegger misunderstands and abuses Platonic metaphysics. Rather than initiating the reification of being (Sein) in beings (das Seiende) and the subordination of nature to human control, as Heidegger accuses, Plato offers us a non-dogmatic metaphysics of human possibility oriented by and subordinated to being, conceived equally as the good and the beautiful. The relevant production constitutes the ethical counterpart of Platonic metaphysics: it is the responsible bringing of ourselves to "presence" in accordance with the measures given in nature, a process that is erotic, progressive, and always on-the-way.
反海德格尔:柏拉图“生产主义形而上学”的辩护
本文针对海德格尔对柏拉图主义的批判,为柏拉图作为生产主义形而上学家进行辩护。海德格尔对柏拉图形而上学的误解和滥用。柏拉图并没有像海德格尔所指责的那样,提出存在在存在中的物化(Sein)和自然从属于人类控制,而是为我们提供了一种非教条式的人类可能性的形而上学,这种形而上学以存在为导向,从属于存在,同样被认为是善和美。相关的生产构成了柏拉图形而上学的伦理对应物:它是根据自然界给出的措施,负责地将我们自己带到“存在”,这是一个情爱的、进步的、永远在路上的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信