Consolidating Indonesia’s Fragile Elections Through E-Voting: Lessons Learned from India and the Philippines

Tareq Muhammad Aziz Elven, Shalahuddin Ahmad Al-Muqorrobin
{"title":"Consolidating Indonesia’s Fragile Elections Through E-Voting: Lessons Learned from India and the Philippines","authors":"Tareq Muhammad Aziz Elven, Shalahuddin Ahmad Al-Muqorrobin","doi":"10.18196/ICLR.V3I1.11298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research argues that implementing the electronic voting (e-voting) system in Indonesia is urged following the nation's first-ever 2019 simultaneous elections, which cost a deadly price of 527 election official lives of reported extreme fatigue during and after the event. Billed as \"the world's most complex election\", it has reached a consensus that the current manual election system, in which five different paper-based elections are voted at a time, has to be changed. Not to mention that the long-time gap between the voting day and the result announcement may create an opportunity for election fraud. This is evidenced by loads of electoral dispute lawsuits from the previous election brought to the Constitutional Court of Indonesia accused the others of cheating. This research stresses that despite the controversies of whether Indonesia, an archipelagic country with more than 17 thousand islands and 267 million people, is ready for e-voting.  Whether the application of technology is an appropriate response to the election problems? E-voting is desired as a long-term solution and intends to solve many issues such as speeding the counting of ballots, reducing the cost of elections, providing accessibility for disabled voters, and increasing overall voter turnout.","PeriodicalId":298750,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Comparative Law Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/ICLR.V3I1.11298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This research argues that implementing the electronic voting (e-voting) system in Indonesia is urged following the nation's first-ever 2019 simultaneous elections, which cost a deadly price of 527 election official lives of reported extreme fatigue during and after the event. Billed as "the world's most complex election", it has reached a consensus that the current manual election system, in which five different paper-based elections are voted at a time, has to be changed. Not to mention that the long-time gap between the voting day and the result announcement may create an opportunity for election fraud. This is evidenced by loads of electoral dispute lawsuits from the previous election brought to the Constitutional Court of Indonesia accused the others of cheating. This research stresses that despite the controversies of whether Indonesia, an archipelagic country with more than 17 thousand islands and 267 million people, is ready for e-voting.  Whether the application of technology is an appropriate response to the election problems? E-voting is desired as a long-term solution and intends to solve many issues such as speeding the counting of ballots, reducing the cost of elections, providing accessibility for disabled voters, and increasing overall voter turnout.
通过电子投票巩固印尼脆弱的选举:印度和菲律宾的经验教训
这项研究认为,在该国首次于2019年同时举行的选举之后,在印度尼西亚实施电子投票(e-voting)系统是迫切需要的,这次选举付出了致命的代价,527名选举官员在选举期间和之后极度疲劳。被称为“世界上最复杂的选举”的这次选举已经达成共识,认为必须改变目前的人工选举制度,即一次投票五个不同的纸质选举。更不用说,从投票日到公布结果的时间间隔太长,可能会为选举舞弊创造机会。印尼宪法法院受理的上届选举选举纠纷诉讼中,有大量案件指控其他候选人作弊。这项研究强调,尽管印尼这个拥有超过1.7万个岛屿和2.67亿人口的群岛国家是否准备好进行电子投票存在争议。科技的应用是否恰当地回应了选举问题?电子投票是一种长期的解决方案,旨在解决许多问题,如加速计票、降低选举成本、为残疾选民提供便利,以及提高选民的总体投票率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信