Results of numerical experiments to establish the influence of drawdown degree on gas and condensate recovery factors

A. Agzamov, G. Efendiyev, G. Moldabayeva, S. Abbasova, H. M. Muhammadiev
{"title":"Results of numerical experiments to establish the influence of drawdown degree on gas and condensate recovery factors","authors":"A. Agzamov, G. Efendiyev, G. Moldabayeva, S. Abbasova, H. M. Muhammadiev","doi":"10.31660/0445-0108-2022-4-57-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the title implies the article presents the results of the analysis of static models of multiple correlation of the gas recovery factor from geological and technological factors. It is shown that one of the main technological factors that determine the value of the gas recovery factor is the differential pressure drawdown, established in the technological modes of well operation. We have analyzed the reasons for the deviation of the actual and design development indicators (a case study of the Northern Nishan gas condensate field). We considered variant calculations of the field development indicators with a constant well stock, but differing in the drawdown in the wells, and concluded that the maximum value of the gas recovery factor of 82.3 % is achieved with drawdown of 5 MPa. It is shown that as the differential pressure drawdown increases, the gas recovery factor decreases and with a drawdown of 17.5 MPa it is only 39 %, which is confirmed by the actual field development indicators.","PeriodicalId":240239,"journal":{"name":"Oil and Gas Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil and Gas Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2022-4-57-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the title implies the article presents the results of the analysis of static models of multiple correlation of the gas recovery factor from geological and technological factors. It is shown that one of the main technological factors that determine the value of the gas recovery factor is the differential pressure drawdown, established in the technological modes of well operation. We have analyzed the reasons for the deviation of the actual and design development indicators (a case study of the Northern Nishan gas condensate field). We considered variant calculations of the field development indicators with a constant well stock, but differing in the drawdown in the wells, and concluded that the maximum value of the gas recovery factor of 82.3 % is achieved with drawdown of 5 MPa. It is shown that as the differential pressure drawdown increases, the gas recovery factor decreases and with a drawdown of 17.5 MPa it is only 39 %, which is confirmed by the actual field development indicators.
数值实验结果确定了压降程度对气凝析油采收率的影响
顾名思义,本文从地质因素和工艺因素两方面介绍了天然气采收率多重相关静态模型的分析结果。结果表明,在井作业工艺模式中建立的压降差是决定采收率的主要工艺因素之一。分析了实际开发指标与设计开发指标偏离的原因(以尼山北部凝析气田为例)。我们考虑了在井存量不变的情况下油田开发指标的各种计算方法,但井的压降不同,得出的结论是,当压降为5 MPa时,天然气采收率可达到82.3%的最大值。结果表明,随着压差的增大,气采系数减小,当压差为17.5 MPa时,气采系数仅为39%,这一点得到了现场实际开发指标的证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信