Safe and Sustainable Fleet Management with Data Analytics and Reinforcement Training

Ryan Ahmadiyar, J. Chun, Caroline Fuccella, Damir Hrnjez, Grace Parzych, Benjamin Weisel, Zeyu Mu, Michael E. Duffy, B. Park
{"title":"Safe and Sustainable Fleet Management with Data Analytics and Reinforcement Training","authors":"Ryan Ahmadiyar, J. Chun, Caroline Fuccella, Damir Hrnjez, Grace Parzych, Benjamin Weisel, Zeyu Mu, Michael E. Duffy, B. Park","doi":"10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The University of Virginia's Facilities Management (FM) Fleet consists of around 260 total vehicles and is committed to safe and sustainable driving. The fleet vehicles contain telematic tracking systems which provide feedback on a multitude of driving behavioral measures, including speeding, harsh braking, hard acceleration, seat belt usage, harsh cornering, and idling time. In a previous study, data collected on these measures was used to develop relevant educational materials on mindful driving. This paper aims to further improve safe and eco-friendly FM driving behaviors by analyzing if reinforcement training, additional scorecards and manager conversations, proved to be effective when given proactively or reactively to increased violations of driving behavioral measures. This paper outlines the process we used in determining when and how to administer the two different training programs and which vehicle shops to involve. One group of shops received in-depth training before any notable violations were detected, which was deemed proactive training. A separate shop received the reactive training after any significant increase in vehicle incidents was detected. These reinforcement training programs were largely based on the professional FM education modules and provided conversation templates for managers to use in order to re-educate their shop's respective drivers. The research showed that reactive reinforcement training was statistically significant for speeding while proactive reinforcement training was not statistically significant; however, further expansion upon both trainings may still be warranted.","PeriodicalId":286724,"journal":{"name":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The University of Virginia's Facilities Management (FM) Fleet consists of around 260 total vehicles and is committed to safe and sustainable driving. The fleet vehicles contain telematic tracking systems which provide feedback on a multitude of driving behavioral measures, including speeding, harsh braking, hard acceleration, seat belt usage, harsh cornering, and idling time. In a previous study, data collected on these measures was used to develop relevant educational materials on mindful driving. This paper aims to further improve safe and eco-friendly FM driving behaviors by analyzing if reinforcement training, additional scorecards and manager conversations, proved to be effective when given proactively or reactively to increased violations of driving behavioral measures. This paper outlines the process we used in determining when and how to administer the two different training programs and which vehicle shops to involve. One group of shops received in-depth training before any notable violations were detected, which was deemed proactive training. A separate shop received the reactive training after any significant increase in vehicle incidents was detected. These reinforcement training programs were largely based on the professional FM education modules and provided conversation templates for managers to use in order to re-educate their shop's respective drivers. The research showed that reactive reinforcement training was statistically significant for speeding while proactive reinforcement training was not statistically significant; however, further expansion upon both trainings may still be warranted.
安全和可持续的车队管理与数据分析和强化培训
弗吉尼亚大学的设施管理(FM)车队由大约260辆车组成,致力于安全和可持续驾驶。车队车辆包含远程信息跟踪系统,该系统可以提供大量驾驶行为措施的反馈,包括超速、急刹车、硬加速、安全带使用情况、急转弯和空转时间。在之前的一项研究中,收集到的这些数据被用来开发有关用心驾驶的教育材料。本文旨在通过分析强化训练、附加记分卡和管理者对话是否被证明在主动或被动地给予违规驾驶行为措施时是有效的,从而进一步改善安全和环保的FM驾驶行为。本文概述了我们在确定何时以及如何管理两种不同的培训计划以及涉及哪些汽车商店时所使用的过程。在发现任何明显违规行为之前,一组商店接受了深入培训,这被视为主动培训。在发现车辆事故明显增加后,另一间车间接受反应性训练。这些强化培训项目主要基于专业的FM教育模块,并提供对话模板供经理使用,以重新教育他们各自的商店司机。研究表明,被动强化训练对超速的影响有统计学意义,而主动强化训练对超速的影响无统计学意义;但是,这两种培训的进一步扩大可能仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信