UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS: TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES IN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS

Suong Ngoc Thi Lu, Huan Buu Nguyen
{"title":"UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS: TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES IN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS","authors":"Suong Ngoc Thi Lu, Huan Buu Nguyen","doi":"10.46827/ejel.v7i4.4417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research into critical thinking has witnessed its role in students’ foreign language learning, including English. Of components contributing to students’ critical thinking development, teachers are the ones who engage students in thinking about or making judgment of what they are doing in their learning process. As critical thinking and language skills are known as intertwined, argumentative essays allow students to reflect on their own writing. However, research on teachers’ perceptions and practices of the interplay between students’ critical thinking and argumentative essays is still meagre. This paper, therefore, examines this area of interest. Data collected in this study include a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Participants were 85 teachers at a university in the Mekong delta, and six participated in the interview process. The findings reveal that teachers’ perceptions of students’ critical thinking regarding interpreting, analysing, inferencing, evaluating and self-regulating were at a high level. Debates and group discussions were the two activities teachers used most in writing classes. Recommendations from this study may offer some pedagogical implications for  the implementation of critical thinking to hone students’ argumentative essay writing.  Article visualizations:","PeriodicalId":226132,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i4.4417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research into critical thinking has witnessed its role in students’ foreign language learning, including English. Of components contributing to students’ critical thinking development, teachers are the ones who engage students in thinking about or making judgment of what they are doing in their learning process. As critical thinking and language skills are known as intertwined, argumentative essays allow students to reflect on their own writing. However, research on teachers’ perceptions and practices of the interplay between students’ critical thinking and argumentative essays is still meagre. This paper, therefore, examines this area of interest. Data collected in this study include a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Participants were 85 teachers at a university in the Mekong delta, and six participated in the interview process. The findings reveal that teachers’ perceptions of students’ critical thinking regarding interpreting, analysing, inferencing, evaluating and self-regulating were at a high level. Debates and group discussions were the two activities teachers used most in writing classes. Recommendations from this study may offer some pedagogical implications for  the implementation of critical thinking to hone students’ argumentative essay writing.  Article visualizations:
大学生批判性思维能力:教师在议论文中的认知与实践
对批判性思维的研究已经见证了它在学生外语学习中的作用,包括英语。在促进学生批判性思维发展的因素中,教师是让学生思考或判断他们在学习过程中所做的事情的人。由于批判性思维和语言技能是交织在一起的,议论文让学生反思自己的写作。然而,关于教师对学生批判性思维和议论文之间相互作用的看法和实践的研究仍然很少。因此,本文将研究这个感兴趣的领域。本研究收集的数据包括问卷调查和半结构化访谈。参与者是湄公河三角洲一所大学的85名教师,其中6人参加了面试过程。调查结果显示,教师对学生在解释、分析、推理、评价和自我调节方面的批判性思维的认知处于较高水平。辩论和小组讨论是教师在写作课上使用最多的两种活动。本研究的建议可能会对批判性思维的实施提供一些教学启示,以磨练学生的议论文写作。可视化条
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信