Remarks and Reflections on Managed Care

H. Rothstein, Osna L. Halle, D. Bernstein
{"title":"Remarks and Reflections on Managed Care","authors":"H. Rothstein, Osna L. Halle, D. Bernstein","doi":"10.1300/J288v01n03_07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The New Jersey Psychological Association surveyed New Jersey psychologists in late 1996 about the impact of managed care on the practice of psychology. Four statements: (SI) My morale and professional identity have changed; (S2) I have changed my approach to therapy; (S3) I have felt pressure to change the quality of care I deliver; and (S4) I have felt pressure to compromise my ethical principles were presented for open-ended responses. Ninety-three to ninety-six percent of psychologists who responded Yes to managed care having affected their practices provided codable comments. Analysis of the codable Yes comments yielded responses emphasizing: loss of control over decision making (SI); excessive emphasis on brief treatment (S2); superficial approach to therapy (S3); and intrusions into confidentiality (S4). The implications for the practice of psychology highlight three key areas where action is needed: professional ethics, funding and coverage, and accountability.","PeriodicalId":146212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychotherapy in Independent Practice","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychotherapy in Independent Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J288v01n03_07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The New Jersey Psychological Association surveyed New Jersey psychologists in late 1996 about the impact of managed care on the practice of psychology. Four statements: (SI) My morale and professional identity have changed; (S2) I have changed my approach to therapy; (S3) I have felt pressure to change the quality of care I deliver; and (S4) I have felt pressure to compromise my ethical principles were presented for open-ended responses. Ninety-three to ninety-six percent of psychologists who responded Yes to managed care having affected their practices provided codable comments. Analysis of the codable Yes comments yielded responses emphasizing: loss of control over decision making (SI); excessive emphasis on brief treatment (S2); superficial approach to therapy (S3); and intrusions into confidentiality (S4). The implications for the practice of psychology highlight three key areas where action is needed: professional ethics, funding and coverage, and accountability.
关于管理式医疗的评论和思考
1996年底,新泽西州心理学会对新泽西州心理学家进行了管理式护理对心理学实践的影响调查。四项陈述:(六)我的士气和职业认同发生了变化;(S2)我已经改变了治疗方法;(3)我感受到了改变我提供的护理质量的压力;以及(S4)我感到了在道德原则上妥协的压力,这些都是开放式的回答。百分之九十三到百分之九十六的心理学家认为管理式护理影响了他们的实践,他们提供了可编码的评论。对可编码的Yes评论的分析得出的回答强调:失去对决策的控制(SI);过分强调简短的治疗(S2);浅表入路治疗(S3);以及侵犯机密(S4)。对心理学实践的影响突出了需要采取行动的三个关键领域:职业道德、资金和覆盖范围以及问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信