STUDY ON THE ESSENTIALS PARTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING

S. Yadav
{"title":"STUDY ON THE ESSENTIALS PARTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING","authors":"S. Yadav","doi":"10.55054/ajpp.v1i1.460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the previous decade, cooperative learning has arisen as the main new way to deal with study hall guidance. One significant justification its support is that various examination concentrates in K–12 study halls, in assorted school settings and across a wide scope of content regions, have uncovered that understudies finishing cooperative learning bunch jobs will in general have higher scholastic grades, higher selfesteem, more prominent quantities of positive social abilities, less generalizations of people of different races or ethnic gatherings, and more noteworthy cognizance of the substance and abilities they are concentrating Furthermore, the viewpoint of understudies functioning as \"scholarly introverts\" in homerooms is altogether different from that of understudies working cooperatively and cooperatively in and as \"cooperative learning scholarly groups\" Even with it's anything but, a larger part of the gathering assignments that instructors use, even educators who guarantee to utilize \"cooperative learning,\" keep on being cooperative gathering undertakings not cooperative learning bunch errands. For example, virtually all \"jigsaw\" exercises are not cooperative learning jigsaw exercises. Just on the grounds that understudies work in little gatherings doesn't imply that they are collaborating to guarantee their own learning and the learning of all others in their This accentuation on scholarly learning accomplishment for every person and all individuals from the gathering is one element that isolates cooperative learning bunches from other gathering undertakings.","PeriodicalId":331838,"journal":{"name":"Amity Journal of Professional Practices","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amity Journal of Professional Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55054/ajpp.v1i1.460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Over the previous decade, cooperative learning has arisen as the main new way to deal with study hall guidance. One significant justification its support is that various examination concentrates in K–12 study halls, in assorted school settings and across a wide scope of content regions, have uncovered that understudies finishing cooperative learning bunch jobs will in general have higher scholastic grades, higher selfesteem, more prominent quantities of positive social abilities, less generalizations of people of different races or ethnic gatherings, and more noteworthy cognizance of the substance and abilities they are concentrating Furthermore, the viewpoint of understudies functioning as "scholarly introverts" in homerooms is altogether different from that of understudies working cooperatively and cooperatively in and as "cooperative learning scholarly groups" Even with it's anything but, a larger part of the gathering assignments that instructors use, even educators who guarantee to utilize "cooperative learning," keep on being cooperative gathering undertakings not cooperative learning bunch errands. For example, virtually all "jigsaw" exercises are not cooperative learning jigsaw exercises. Just on the grounds that understudies work in little gatherings doesn't imply that they are collaborating to guarantee their own learning and the learning of all others in their This accentuation on scholarly learning accomplishment for every person and all individuals from the gathering is one element that isolates cooperative learning bunches from other gathering undertakings.
合作学习的要素研究
在过去的十年里,合作学习已经成为应对自习室指导的主要新方式。支持它的一个重要理由是,在K-12自习室、各种各样的学校环境和广泛的内容区域进行的各种考试集中发现,完成合作学习组合作业的学生通常具有更高的学习成绩、更高的自尊、更突出的积极社会能力,对不同种族或民族聚会的人的概括程度更低。更值得注意的是,对他们集中学习的内容和能力的认知。此外,在课堂上扮演“内向的学者”角色的学生的观点与在“合作学习的学术团体”中扮演合作和合作角色的学生的观点是完全不同的,即使这是完全不同的,教师使用的大部分集合作业,甚至教育家保证使用“合作学习”,继续合作采集事业,而不是合作学习打杂。例如,实际上所有的“拼图”练习都不是合作学习的拼图练习。仅仅因为学生在小聚会中工作并不意味着他们在合作以保证他们自己的学习和其他所有人的学习。这种对聚会中每个人和所有个体的学术学习成就的强调是将合作学习群体与其他聚会活动隔离开来的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信