EFFICIENCY OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL PROTECTION: THEORETICAL ASPECTS

O. Pravotorova
{"title":"EFFICIENCY OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL PROTECTION: THEORETICAL ASPECTS","authors":"O. Pravotorova","doi":"10.15421/391938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, the key aspects of the effectiveness of administrative and legal protection are researched on the basis of current legislation and opinions on this issue of scholars in the field of administrative law.\nThe author notes that administrative-legal protection is an institution of administrative law consisting of uniform rules of administrative law whose legal effect is directed at the prevention of offenses (crime prevention) and the restoration of violated rights, freedoms and legal interests of individuals and juridical persons carried out for using administrative tools – forms of administrative activity of public administration, administrative coercion and administrative enforcement.\nThe steady development of social relations in administrative law, the improvement of modern technologies, as well as the formation of an information society, could not but affect the state of efficiency of modern administrative and legal protection. The author states that the effectiveness of administrative and legal protection is an integral part of the theory and practice of such protection. Effectiveness of administrative and legal protection is the ability of public administration based on the norms of administrative law to qualitatively and timely restore violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of non-authorized individuals and legal entities, public interest of the state and society.\nFour levels of effectiveness of administrative and legal protection have been formed: sufficient, when the tasks of the public administration in restoration of violated rights of non-authorized persons are generally fulfilled in the normative-legal acts; insufficient, characterized by frequent cases of non-renewal of violated rights and freedoms of man and citizen, but not characterized by systematic;\ncrisis, when there are systematic violations of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, they do not receive from the state through the indirect activity of the public administration of protection, and dissatisfaction of citizens acquires a significant social weighty protest; is ineffective when the violated rights and freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities are practically not restored, and the law-enforcement system is full of corruption, while the norms of administrative-legal protection change their humane and fair essence and themselves become factors of the destabilization of social relations.\nIt is concluded that administrative-legal protection exists through a system of administrative-legal norms, and at the same time it is proved that it can not, from the point of view of epistemology of law, exist in such narrow limits as the state determines, it reflects objective social relations, protects the most\nimportant values, Which during this period of time may not yet find the formal registration in the sources of administrative law, is provided on the basis of administrative law and simultaneously governed by the norms of administrative law, which will establish not only the state, although it primarily.\nFour levels of effectiveness of administrative and legal protection have been formed: sufficient, when the tasks of public administration set forth in normative legal acts in relation to the restoration of violated rights of non-authorities as a whole are fulfilled; insufficient, characterized by non-isolated cases, not the restoration of violated rights and freedoms of man and citizen, but not characterized by systematic; crisis, when there are systematic violations of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, they do not receive protection from the state through the indirect activity of the public administration; the dissatisfaction of citizens acquires significant social protest; is ineffective when the violated rights and freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities are practically not restored, and corruption penetrates the law-enforcement system, while the norms of administrative-legal protection change their humane and fair essence and they themselves become factors of destabilization of social relations.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/391938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, the key aspects of the effectiveness of administrative and legal protection are researched on the basis of current legislation and opinions on this issue of scholars in the field of administrative law. The author notes that administrative-legal protection is an institution of administrative law consisting of uniform rules of administrative law whose legal effect is directed at the prevention of offenses (crime prevention) and the restoration of violated rights, freedoms and legal interests of individuals and juridical persons carried out for using administrative tools – forms of administrative activity of public administration, administrative coercion and administrative enforcement. The steady development of social relations in administrative law, the improvement of modern technologies, as well as the formation of an information society, could not but affect the state of efficiency of modern administrative and legal protection. The author states that the effectiveness of administrative and legal protection is an integral part of the theory and practice of such protection. Effectiveness of administrative and legal protection is the ability of public administration based on the norms of administrative law to qualitatively and timely restore violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of non-authorized individuals and legal entities, public interest of the state and society. Four levels of effectiveness of administrative and legal protection have been formed: sufficient, when the tasks of the public administration in restoration of violated rights of non-authorized persons are generally fulfilled in the normative-legal acts; insufficient, characterized by frequent cases of non-renewal of violated rights and freedoms of man and citizen, but not characterized by systematic; crisis, when there are systematic violations of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, they do not receive from the state through the indirect activity of the public administration of protection, and dissatisfaction of citizens acquires a significant social weighty protest; is ineffective when the violated rights and freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities are practically not restored, and the law-enforcement system is full of corruption, while the norms of administrative-legal protection change their humane and fair essence and themselves become factors of the destabilization of social relations. It is concluded that administrative-legal protection exists through a system of administrative-legal norms, and at the same time it is proved that it can not, from the point of view of epistemology of law, exist in such narrow limits as the state determines, it reflects objective social relations, protects the most important values, Which during this period of time may not yet find the formal registration in the sources of administrative law, is provided on the basis of administrative law and simultaneously governed by the norms of administrative law, which will establish not only the state, although it primarily. Four levels of effectiveness of administrative and legal protection have been formed: sufficient, when the tasks of public administration set forth in normative legal acts in relation to the restoration of violated rights of non-authorities as a whole are fulfilled; insufficient, characterized by non-isolated cases, not the restoration of violated rights and freedoms of man and citizen, but not characterized by systematic; crisis, when there are systematic violations of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, they do not receive protection from the state through the indirect activity of the public administration; the dissatisfaction of citizens acquires significant social protest; is ineffective when the violated rights and freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities are practically not restored, and corruption penetrates the law-enforcement system, while the norms of administrative-legal protection change their humane and fair essence and they themselves become factors of destabilization of social relations.
行政保护和法律保护的效率:理论方面
本文在分析我国现行立法现状的基础上,结合行政法学界学者对行政保护效力问题的看法,对行政保护效力与法律保护效力的关键问题进行了研究。作者指出,行政法律保护是一种行政法制度,由统一的行政法规则组成,其法律效力旨在预防犯罪(预防犯罪)和恢复个人和法人因使用行政工具-公共行政的行政活动形式、行政强制和行政强制而遭受侵犯的权利、自由和合法利益。行政法律社会关系的稳步发展、现代技术的进步以及信息社会的形成,必然会影响现代行政法律保护的效率状态。行政保护和法律保护的有效性是行政保护理论和实践的重要组成部分。行政和法律保护的有效性是指公共行政在行政法规范的基础上,有质量地、及时地恢复未被授权的个人和法人被侵犯的权利、自由和合法利益以及国家和社会公共利益的能力。行政和法律保护的有效性已经形成了四个层次:充分的,当公共行政在恢复未授权人被侵犯的权利方面的任务一般在规范性法律行为中得到履行时;不充分,其特点是经常发生侵犯人和公民权利和自由的案件不再更新,但不具有系统的特征;危机,当个人和法人实体的权利、自由和合法利益受到系统侵犯时,他们没有从国家通过公共行政的间接活动得到保护,而公民的不满获得重大的社会重大抗议;当被侵犯的个人和法人的权利自由和合法利益实际上得不到恢复,执法体系充满腐败,行政法律保护规范改变了其人道和公平的本质,本身成为社会关系不稳定的因素时,行政法律保护是无效的。结论是行政法律保护是通过行政法律规范体系而存在的,同时从法学认识论的角度证明,行政法律保护不可能存在于国家规定的狭窄范围内,它反映客观的社会关系,保护最重要的价值,在这一时期可能还没有在行政法渊源中找到正式的登记。是在行政法的基础上提供的,同时受行政法规范的支配,这不仅会建立国家,虽然它主要。行政和法律保护的有效性已经形成了四个层次:充分的,当规范性法律行为中关于恢复非当局被侵犯的权利的公共行政任务作为一个整体得到履行时;不充分,以非孤立案例为特征,不恢复被侵犯的人和公民的权利和自由,但不以系统为特征;危机,当有系统地侵犯个人和法人的权利、自由和合法利益时,他们不会通过公共行政的间接活动得到国家的保护;公民的不满获得了显著的社会抗议;当被侵犯的个人和法人的权利自由和合法利益实际上得不到恢复,腐败渗透到执法体系中,行政法律保护规范改变了其人道和公平的本质,本身成为社会关系不稳定的因素时,行政法律保护是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信