Median Splits, Type II Errors, and False Positive Consumer Psychology: Don't Fight the Power

G. McClelland, John G. Lynch, J. Irwin, Stephen A. Spiller, G. Fitzsimons
{"title":"Median Splits, Type II Errors, and False Positive Consumer Psychology: Don't Fight the Power","authors":"G. McClelland, John G. Lynch, J. Irwin, Stephen A. Spiller, G. Fitzsimons","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2580320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considerable prior statistical work has criticized replacing a continuously measured variable in a general linear model with a dichotomy based on a median split of that variable. Iacobucci, Posovac, Kardes, Schneider, and Popovich (this issue) defend the practice of “median splits�? using both conceptual arguments and simulations. We show that both their conceptual arguments and their simulations range from incomplete to incorrect. There are no real benefits to median splits, and there are real costs in increases in Type II errors through loss of power and increases in Type I errors through false positive consumer psychology. Median splits remain a bad idea.","PeriodicalId":443127,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considerable prior statistical work has criticized replacing a continuously measured variable in a general linear model with a dichotomy based on a median split of that variable. Iacobucci, Posovac, Kardes, Schneider, and Popovich (this issue) defend the practice of “median splits�? using both conceptual arguments and simulations. We show that both their conceptual arguments and their simulations range from incomplete to incorrect. There are no real benefits to median splits, and there are real costs in increases in Type II errors through loss of power and increases in Type I errors through false positive consumer psychology. Median splits remain a bad idea.
中位数分割、II型错误和错误正面的消费者心理:不要与权力抗争
相当多的先前统计工作批评用基于该变量的中位数分割的二分法取代一般线性模型中的连续测量变量。亚科布奇、波索瓦茨、卡尔德斯、施奈德和波波维奇(本期)为“中位数分割”的做法辩护。使用概念论证和模拟。我们表明,他们的概念论点和他们的模拟范围从不完整到不正确。中位数分割没有真正的好处,而且由于失去动力而增加的II型错误和由于虚假积极的消费者心理而增加的I型错误确实存在成本。中间分割仍然是个坏主意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信