{"title":"The Aberration of Starlight and/in Postmodernist Fiction","authors":"Bernd Klahn","doi":"10.46472/cc.01208.0227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gilbert Sorrentino's novel, ‘Aberration of Starlight’, alludes to an experiment by James Bradley (1728) proving that the speed of light is enormously high, but limited. His technique consisted of a measurement of the angle, under which a given star could be observed. His experiments proved a tight connection between the direction of the Earth's movement and the angle of observation, resulting in a special angle of aberration of starlight; thus he could give a quantitative value for the velocity of light, taken from astronomical observations of a star, without employing any further technical device. Bradley's main idea consisted in the concept that an unknown speed might be measured by comparing it to the velocity of the observer, who has to fix his observations on one distant object. This idea may be traced in Sorrentino's novel, where he applies Bradley's concept to the description of 'moving subjects' whose only chance to register the developmental speed of another subject is to compare it – in a given coercive situation – to one's own rate of change. Analogous to Bradley's geometrical technique, Sorrentino applies methods of 'narrative triangulation', leading to a complex but systematically structured pattern of subjective interactions. Regarding this (rather technological) background, Sorrentino's novel is a neological fictional achievement, offering tightly knit correlations between the worldmaking of modern natural sciences and the narrative modes of (post)modern self- and world-composition.","PeriodicalId":152044,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Cosmos","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Cosmos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46472/cc.01208.0227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gilbert Sorrentino's novel, ‘Aberration of Starlight’, alludes to an experiment by James Bradley (1728) proving that the speed of light is enormously high, but limited. His technique consisted of a measurement of the angle, under which a given star could be observed. His experiments proved a tight connection between the direction of the Earth's movement and the angle of observation, resulting in a special angle of aberration of starlight; thus he could give a quantitative value for the velocity of light, taken from astronomical observations of a star, without employing any further technical device. Bradley's main idea consisted in the concept that an unknown speed might be measured by comparing it to the velocity of the observer, who has to fix his observations on one distant object. This idea may be traced in Sorrentino's novel, where he applies Bradley's concept to the description of 'moving subjects' whose only chance to register the developmental speed of another subject is to compare it – in a given coercive situation – to one's own rate of change. Analogous to Bradley's geometrical technique, Sorrentino applies methods of 'narrative triangulation', leading to a complex but systematically structured pattern of subjective interactions. Regarding this (rather technological) background, Sorrentino's novel is a neological fictional achievement, offering tightly knit correlations between the worldmaking of modern natural sciences and the narrative modes of (post)modern self- and world-composition.
吉尔伯特·索伦蒂诺(Gilbert Sorrentino)的小说《星光畸变》(Aberration of Starlight)暗指詹姆斯·布拉德利(James Bradley)(1728年)的一项实验,该实验证明光速极高,但有限。他的技术包括测量角度,在这个角度下可以观察到给定的恒星。他的实验证明了地球运动的方向和观测的角度之间有紧密的联系,从而产生了一个特殊的星光像差角度;这样,他就可以根据对恒星的天文观测给出光速的定量值,而无需使用任何进一步的技术设备。布拉德利的主要思想包括这样一个概念:一个未知的速度可以通过与观察者的速度进行比较来测量,观察者必须将他的观察固定在一个遥远的物体上。这个想法可以追溯到索伦蒂诺的小说中,他把布拉德利的概念应用到“移动主体”的描述中,这些主体记录另一个主体发展速度的唯一机会是将其与自己的变化速度进行比较——在给定的强制情况下。类似于布拉德利的几何技术,索伦蒂诺运用了“叙事三角”的方法,导致了一个复杂但系统的主观互动结构模式。在这种(相当技术性的)背景下,索伦蒂诺的小说是一种新颖的虚构成就,在现代自然科学的世界制造与(后)现代自我和世界构成的叙事模式之间提供了紧密的联系。