A Multi-Relaxation-Time Finite Volume Discrete Boltzmann Method for Viscous Flows

Leitao Chen, Hamid Sadat, L. Schaefer
{"title":"A Multi-Relaxation-Time Finite Volume Discrete Boltzmann Method for Viscous Flows","authors":"Leitao Chen, Hamid Sadat, L. Schaefer","doi":"10.1115/ajkfluids2019-5034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Conventional constitutive law-based fluid dynamic models solve the conservation equations of mass and momentum, while kinetic models, such as the well-known lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), solve the propagation and collision processes of the Boltzmann equation-governed particle distribution function (PDF). Such models can provide an a priori modeling platform on a more fundamental level while easily reconstructing macroscopic variables such as velocity and pressure from the PDF. While the LBM requires a rigid and uniform grid for spatial discretization, another similar unique kinetic model known as the finite volume discrete Boltzmann method (FVDBM) has the ability to solve the discrete Boltzmann equation (DBE) on unstructured grids. The FVDBM can easily and accurately capture curved and more complicated fluid flow boundaries (usually solid boundaries), which cannot be satisfactorily realized in the LBM framework. As a result, the FVDBM preserves the physical advantages of the LBM over the constitutive law-based model approach, but also incorporates a better boundary treatment. However, the FVDBM suffers larger diffusion errors compared to the LBM approach. Building on our previous work, the FVDBM is further developed by integrating the multi-relaxation-time (MRT) collision model into the existing framework. Compared to the existing FVDBM approach that uses the Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook (BGK) collision model, which is also known as the single-relaxation-time (SRT) model, the new model can significantly reduce diffusion error or numerical viscosity, which is essential in the simulation of viscous flows. After testing the new model, the MRT-FVDBM, and the old model, the BGK-FVDBM, on Taylor-Green vortex flow, which can quantify the diffusion error of the applied model, it is found that the MRT-FVDBM can reduce the diffusion error at a faster rate as the mesh resolution increases, which renders the MRT-FVDBM a higher-order model than the BGK-FVDBM. At the highest mesh resolution tested in this paper, the reduction of the diffusion error by the MRT-FVDBM can be up to 30%.","PeriodicalId":346736,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ajkfluids2019-5034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conventional constitutive law-based fluid dynamic models solve the conservation equations of mass and momentum, while kinetic models, such as the well-known lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), solve the propagation and collision processes of the Boltzmann equation-governed particle distribution function (PDF). Such models can provide an a priori modeling platform on a more fundamental level while easily reconstructing macroscopic variables such as velocity and pressure from the PDF. While the LBM requires a rigid and uniform grid for spatial discretization, another similar unique kinetic model known as the finite volume discrete Boltzmann method (FVDBM) has the ability to solve the discrete Boltzmann equation (DBE) on unstructured grids. The FVDBM can easily and accurately capture curved and more complicated fluid flow boundaries (usually solid boundaries), which cannot be satisfactorily realized in the LBM framework. As a result, the FVDBM preserves the physical advantages of the LBM over the constitutive law-based model approach, but also incorporates a better boundary treatment. However, the FVDBM suffers larger diffusion errors compared to the LBM approach. Building on our previous work, the FVDBM is further developed by integrating the multi-relaxation-time (MRT) collision model into the existing framework. Compared to the existing FVDBM approach that uses the Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook (BGK) collision model, which is also known as the single-relaxation-time (SRT) model, the new model can significantly reduce diffusion error or numerical viscosity, which is essential in the simulation of viscous flows. After testing the new model, the MRT-FVDBM, and the old model, the BGK-FVDBM, on Taylor-Green vortex flow, which can quantify the diffusion error of the applied model, it is found that the MRT-FVDBM can reduce the diffusion error at a faster rate as the mesh resolution increases, which renders the MRT-FVDBM a higher-order model than the BGK-FVDBM. At the highest mesh resolution tested in this paper, the reduction of the diffusion error by the MRT-FVDBM can be up to 30%.
粘性流动的多松弛时间有限体积离散玻尔兹曼方法
传统的基于本构律的流体动力学模型求解质量和动量守恒方程,而动力学模型,如著名的晶格玻尔兹曼方法(LBM),求解玻尔兹曼方程控制的粒子分布函数的传播和碰撞过程。这样的模型可以在更基本的层面上提供一个先验的建模平台,同时很容易从PDF中重建宏观变量,如速度和压力。虽然LBM需要刚性和均匀网格进行空间离散化,但另一种类似的独特动力学模型称为有限体积离散玻尔兹曼方法(FVDBM)具有在非结构化网格上求解离散玻尔兹曼方程(DBE)的能力。FVDBM可以方便、准确地捕获弯曲的、更复杂的流体流动边界(通常是固体边界),这在LBM框架中是无法令人满意地实现的。因此,FVDBM保留了LBM相对于基于本构律的模型方法的物理优势,但也包含了更好的边界处理。然而,与LBM方法相比,FVDBM的扩散误差更大。在我们之前工作的基础上,通过将多松弛时间(MRT)碰撞模型集成到现有框架中,进一步发展了FVDBM。与现有使用Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK)碰撞模型(也称为单松弛时间(SRT)模型)的FVDBM方法相比,新模型可以显著减小扩散误差或数值粘度,这在模拟粘性流动中是必不可少的。在Taylor-Green涡旋上对MRT-FVDBM模型和BGK-FVDBM模型进行了量化模型扩散误差的测试,发现随着网格分辨率的增加,MRT-FVDBM可以更快地减小模型的扩散误差,使MRT-FVDBM成为比BGK-FVDBM更高阶的模型。在本文测试的最高网格分辨率下,MRT-FVDBM的扩散误差降低幅度可达30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信