The Husserlian influence on Max Scheler’s material ethics

Luiza Aparecida Bello Borges
{"title":"The Husserlian influence on Max Scheler’s material ethics","authors":"Luiza Aparecida Bello Borges","doi":"10.59780/ywld2479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to show a foundation for the possibility of the values intuition in Max Scheler’s material ethics, putting light into the influences suffered by the Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological proposal. The intentionality of consciousness, developed by Husserl in Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie (1913), and the phenomenological investigations present in Logische Untersuchungen (1901) are highlighted in this article. According to Husserl, in the phenomenological relation between the consciousness and the world, the human being intuits the universal which are a priori, necessary and transcendent through the categorical intuition. This intentional consciousness is the same as that which intuits the values in the practical dimension through the schelerian emotional intuition. So, the values are a priori, universal, necessary and transcendent as well. Therefore, the discussion about the possibility of knowledge of values pervades the problem about the knowledge’s possibility of universal brought by Husserl. The development of the research takes the form of philosophical investigation in which an identifiable object is defined, the comparative study between the Husserlian and Schelerian phenomenological proposals from the approach of universals.","PeriodicalId":123297,"journal":{"name":"Revista Inquietude","volume":"279 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Inquietude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59780/ywld2479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article intends to show a foundation for the possibility of the values intuition in Max Scheler’s material ethics, putting light into the influences suffered by the Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological proposal. The intentionality of consciousness, developed by Husserl in Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie (1913), and the phenomenological investigations present in Logische Untersuchungen (1901) are highlighted in this article. According to Husserl, in the phenomenological relation between the consciousness and the world, the human being intuits the universal which are a priori, necessary and transcendent through the categorical intuition. This intentional consciousness is the same as that which intuits the values in the practical dimension through the schelerian emotional intuition. So, the values are a priori, universal, necessary and transcendent as well. Therefore, the discussion about the possibility of knowledge of values pervades the problem about the knowledge’s possibility of universal brought by Husserl. The development of the research takes the form of philosophical investigation in which an identifiable object is defined, the comparative study between the Husserlian and Schelerian phenomenological proposals from the approach of universals.
胡塞尔对谢勒物质伦理学的影响
本文旨在揭示舍勒物质伦理学中价值直觉可能性的基础,揭示胡塞尔现象学主张所受到的影响。本文重点介绍了胡塞尔在《知性与理性Phänomenologie与phänomenologischen哲学》(1913)中提出的意识的意向性,以及在《逻辑学研究》(1901)中提出的现象学研究。胡塞尔认为,在意识与世界的现象学关系中,人通过直言直观直观到先天的、必然的和超越的普遍性。这种有意识的意识与通过舍勒式情感直觉在实践维度中直觉价值的意识是相同的。因此,价值既是先天的,又是普遍的,又是必然的,又是先验的。因此,关于价值知识的可能性的讨论就渗透着胡塞尔关于知识的普遍性可能性的问题。研究的发展采取了哲学研究的形式,其中一个可识别的对象被定义,胡塞尔和舍勒的现象学建议的比较研究从共相的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信