Thermoforming technique for suppressing reduction in mouthguard thickness: Part 2 Effect of model height and model moving distance.

Mutsumi Takahashi, Yogetsu Bando
{"title":"Thermoforming technique for suppressing reduction in mouthguard thickness: Part 2 Effect of model height and model moving distance.","authors":"Mutsumi Takahashi, Yogetsu Bando","doi":"10.4236/msa.2020.113012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND/AIM\nWearing a mouthguard reduces the risk of sports-related injuries, but the material and thickness of the mouthguard has a substantial impact on its effectiveness and safety. The aim of this study was to establish a thermoforming technique in which the model position is moved just before formation to suppress the reduction in thickness. For that end, the effects of model height and model moving distance to the mouthguard thickness were investigated.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nEthylene-vinyl-acetate sheets of 4.0-mm-thick and a vacuum forming machine were used. Three hard plaster models were trimmed so that the height of the anterior teeth was 25 mm, 30 mm, and 35 mm. Model position (MP) was 40 mm from the front of the forming unit. The sheet was softened until it sagged 15 mm, after which the sheet frame was lowered to cover the model. The model was then pushed from behind to move it forward and the vacuum was switched on. The model was moved distances of 20 mm, 25 mm, or 30 mm whereas a control model was not moved. Thickness after formation was measured with a specialized caliper. Differences in mouthguard thickness due to model height and moving distance were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSheet thickness decreased as the model height increased. Each MP condition was significantly thicker than the control in each model. There was no significant difference among MP conditions except for the buccal surface.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nMoving the model forward by 20 mm or more just before formation is useful to secure the labial thickness of the mouthguard. This thermoforming technique increases the thickness by 1.5 times or more compared with the normal forming method, regardless of model height.","PeriodicalId":115909,"journal":{"name":"Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2020.113012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM Wearing a mouthguard reduces the risk of sports-related injuries, but the material and thickness of the mouthguard has a substantial impact on its effectiveness and safety. The aim of this study was to establish a thermoforming technique in which the model position is moved just before formation to suppress the reduction in thickness. For that end, the effects of model height and model moving distance to the mouthguard thickness were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ethylene-vinyl-acetate sheets of 4.0-mm-thick and a vacuum forming machine were used. Three hard plaster models were trimmed so that the height of the anterior teeth was 25 mm, 30 mm, and 35 mm. Model position (MP) was 40 mm from the front of the forming unit. The sheet was softened until it sagged 15 mm, after which the sheet frame was lowered to cover the model. The model was then pushed from behind to move it forward and the vacuum was switched on. The model was moved distances of 20 mm, 25 mm, or 30 mm whereas a control model was not moved. Thickness after formation was measured with a specialized caliper. Differences in mouthguard thickness due to model height and moving distance were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS Sheet thickness decreased as the model height increased. Each MP condition was significantly thicker than the control in each model. There was no significant difference among MP conditions except for the buccal surface. CONCLUSIONS Moving the model forward by 20 mm or more just before formation is useful to secure the labial thickness of the mouthguard. This thermoforming technique increases the thickness by 1.5 times or more compared with the normal forming method, regardless of model height.
抑制护齿厚度减小的热成型技术:第2部分:模型高度和模型移动距离的影响。
背景/目的佩戴护齿可以降低运动相关损伤的风险,但护齿的材料和厚度对其有效性和安全性有重大影响。本研究的目的是建立一种热成形技术,在该技术中,模型位置在成形前移动,以抑制厚度的减少。为此,研究了模型高度和模型移动距离对牙套厚度的影响。材料与方法采用4.0 mm厚的乙烯-醋酸乙烯片材和真空成型机。修整3个硬石膏模型,使前牙高度分别为25mm、30mm和35mm。模型位置(MP)距成形单元前方40mm。板材被软化,直到它下垂15毫米,之后板材框架被降低,以覆盖模型。然后从后面推动模型向前移动,打开真空开关。模型被移动了20毫米、25毫米或30毫米的距离,而对照模型没有移动。地层后厚度用专用卡尺测量。采用双因素方差分析和Bonferroni多重比较检验分析模型高度和移动距离对护齿厚度的影响。结果薄片厚度随模型高度的增加而减小。在每个模型中,每个MP条件都明显比对照组厚。除颊面外,不同MP状态间无显著性差异。结论塑形前将模型向前移动20mm以上有利于护齿器唇部厚度的固定。无论模型高度如何,这种热成型技术与常规成型方法相比,厚度增加了1.5倍或更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信