Robin and the Making of American Adolescence by Lauren R. O'Connor (review)

Stephen M. Zimmerly
{"title":"Robin and the Making of American Adolescence by Lauren R. O'Connor (review)","authors":"Stephen M. Zimmerly","doi":"10.1353/ink.2022.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"222 Woo and Stoll conclude their collection by thinking about the role of the comics scholar in the comics world. Taking Bourdieu as a point of departure, they argue that “researchers are not separate from the worlds they study” (234) and choose to include, as a final chapter, an interview between themselves, foundational theorist and scholar Charles Hatfield, and early career scholar Franny Howes. The chapter is a meaningful conclusion to the collection not only because it effectively establishes the position of theorist and researcher of comics within the larger theoretical framework of the collection, but also nicely demonstrates the method of semi-structured interviews. In this way, the final offering of the collection effectively combines the theoretical and empirical focuses of the text into a single conversation and demonstrates how these two principles can contribute to better understanding comics, by better understanding their social context. This collection offers readers a glimpse into what Woo and Stoll call “the exciting, messy world around comic books and graphic novels” (xvi). It invites researchers to “go exploring” (xvii) in the comics world with the social scientific model of inquiry and advocates for an understanding of comics through an understanding of the social contexts that surround them. Through this work, Woo and Stoll have put together one of the most meaningful collections on the future of comics and comics studies in recent memory. They have provided a clear and articulate model for expanding our understanding of comics through approaches rooted in social scientific research and demonstrate how empirical research with the publics and human actors involved in the comics world can not only illuminate new meanings made within the fringes of what has traditionally been thought of as comics studies, but also radically redefine how we understand comics and other visual texts as a result.","PeriodicalId":392545,"journal":{"name":"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ink.2022.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

222 Woo and Stoll conclude their collection by thinking about the role of the comics scholar in the comics world. Taking Bourdieu as a point of departure, they argue that “researchers are not separate from the worlds they study” (234) and choose to include, as a final chapter, an interview between themselves, foundational theorist and scholar Charles Hatfield, and early career scholar Franny Howes. The chapter is a meaningful conclusion to the collection not only because it effectively establishes the position of theorist and researcher of comics within the larger theoretical framework of the collection, but also nicely demonstrates the method of semi-structured interviews. In this way, the final offering of the collection effectively combines the theoretical and empirical focuses of the text into a single conversation and demonstrates how these two principles can contribute to better understanding comics, by better understanding their social context. This collection offers readers a glimpse into what Woo and Stoll call “the exciting, messy world around comic books and graphic novels” (xvi). It invites researchers to “go exploring” (xvii) in the comics world with the social scientific model of inquiry and advocates for an understanding of comics through an understanding of the social contexts that surround them. Through this work, Woo and Stoll have put together one of the most meaningful collections on the future of comics and comics studies in recent memory. They have provided a clear and articulate model for expanding our understanding of comics through approaches rooted in social scientific research and demonstrate how empirical research with the publics and human actors involved in the comics world can not only illuminate new meanings made within the fringes of what has traditionally been thought of as comics studies, but also radically redefine how we understand comics and other visual texts as a result.
《罗宾与美国青少年的形成》劳伦·r·奥康纳著(书评)
222吴和斯托尔在结尾处思考了漫画学者在漫画世界中的角色。他们以布迪厄为出发点,认为“研究人员并不是与他们研究的世界分开的”(234),并选择在最后一章中包括他们自己、基础理论家和学者查尔斯·哈特菲尔德(Charles Hatfield)和早期职业学者弗兰尼·豪斯(Franny Howes)之间的访谈。本章是本文集的一个有意义的结论,不仅因为它有效地确立了漫画理论家和研究者在该文集更大的理论框架中的地位,而且还很好地展示了半结构化访谈的方法。通过这种方式,该系列的最终产品有效地将文本的理论和经验重点结合到一个单一的对话中,并展示了这两个原则如何通过更好地理解漫画的社会背景来更好地理解漫画。这本合集让读者得以一窥吴和斯托尔所说的“围绕漫画书和图画小说的令人兴奋、混乱的世界”(xvi)。它邀请研究人员用社会科学的探究模式在漫画世界中“探索”(xvii),并倡导通过理解漫画周围的社会背景来理解漫画。通过这项工作,Woo和Stoll汇集了最近记忆中关于漫画和漫画研究的未来最有意义的集合之一。他们提供了一个清晰而清晰的模型,通过根植于社会科学研究的方法来扩展我们对漫画的理解,并展示了漫画世界中涉及的公众和人类演员的实证研究如何不仅阐明了传统上被认为是漫画研究的边缘所产生的新意义,而且从根本上重新定义了我们如何理解漫画和其他视觉文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信