CRIMINAL LAW AND CONCILIATION AGREEMENTS IN THE MUSCOVY OF THE XVTH–XVIIth CENTURY

A. D. Strunskiy
{"title":"CRIMINAL LAW AND CONCILIATION AGREEMENTS IN THE MUSCOVY OF THE XVTH–XVIIth CENTURY","authors":"A. D. Strunskiy","doi":"10.37279/2413-1733-2021-7-2-39-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of possibility of concluding a conciliation agreement on criminal cases in the Muscovy of the XVth–XVIIth centuries is discussed in the article. The regulations of the XIVth–XVIIth century containing pro-visions on the possibility of concluding a conciliation agreement as to the criminal cases are analyzed. The conclusion about the possibility of concluding a conciliation agreement in relation to crimes of private matter is made by the author on the basis of the use of the formal legal method. Robbery and theft, which the legislator began to classify as crimes of a public matter is the only exception. At the same time, with regard to the possibility of concluding a conciliation agreement on cases related to theft, the legislator mitigated the position in the XVIIth century. These conclusions are supported by a microhistorical research of conciliation agreements of the XVIIth century. The author concludes that practice of concluding conciliation agreements in criminal cases of private prosecution was widespread, did not contradict the law, corresponded to legal customs and social context.","PeriodicalId":275116,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37279/2413-1733-2021-7-2-39-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of possibility of concluding a conciliation agreement on criminal cases in the Muscovy of the XVth–XVIIth centuries is discussed in the article. The regulations of the XIVth–XVIIth century containing pro-visions on the possibility of concluding a conciliation agreement as to the criminal cases are analyzed. The conclusion about the possibility of concluding a conciliation agreement in relation to crimes of private matter is made by the author on the basis of the use of the formal legal method. Robbery and theft, which the legislator began to classify as crimes of a public matter is the only exception. At the same time, with regard to the possibility of concluding a conciliation agreement on cases related to theft, the legislator mitigated the position in the XVIIth century. These conclusions are supported by a microhistorical research of conciliation agreements of the XVIIth century. The author concludes that practice of concluding conciliation agreements in criminal cases of private prosecution was widespread, did not contradict the law, corresponded to legal customs and social context.
16 - 17世纪莫斯科地区的刑法与和解协议
本文讨论了15 - 17世纪莫斯科地区刑事案件调解协议的可能性问题。分析了十四、十七世纪关于刑事案件调解协议订立可能性的规定。笔者在运用正式法律方法的基础上,对私事犯罪订立和解协议的可能性作出了结论。抢劫和盗窃是唯一的例外,立法者开始将其归类为公共事务犯罪。同时,关于就与盗窃有关的案件缔结和解协议的可能性,立法者减轻了17世纪的立场。这些结论得到了对18世纪和解协议的微观历史研究的支持。发件人的结论是,在自诉刑事案件中缔结和解协议的做法很普遍,不违反法律,符合法律习俗和社会背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信