Enabling Institutional Messaging: TV Journalists’ Work with Interviewee Responses

C. Lo, Di Yu
{"title":"Enabling Institutional Messaging: TV Journalists’ Work with Interviewee Responses","authors":"C. Lo, Di Yu","doi":"10.7916/D8K6623T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In public broadcasting, the primary goal of interviewing an expert is to inform and educate the audience for the benefit of societal interests (Clayman, 2013). Previous work on news interviews has noted that this type of public discourse not only involves the host and the expert, but also an overhearing audience (Clayman & Heritage, 2002; Hutchby, 1995); moreover, the host is positioned as the “tribune” of the people (Clayman, 2002), tasked with the responsibility to maximize the public’s understanding of and knowledge about what may concern them. While the audience as the third party in the question-answer sequence in news interviews has received considerable attention in the literature, less is known about how the interviewer works with the health expert’s responses to questions in order to facilitate the audience’s understanding of health initiatives. In this paper, we examine how the interviewer designs a follow-up turn to (1) provide background or supplemental information which contextualizes the interviewee's prior response and to (2) reformulate the expert’s explanation from the perspective of the general public, thereby facilitating the audience’s understanding of initiatives pertaining to public health.","PeriodicalId":222081,"journal":{"name":"Communicating with the Public","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicating with the Public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K6623T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In public broadcasting, the primary goal of interviewing an expert is to inform and educate the audience for the benefit of societal interests (Clayman, 2013). Previous work on news interviews has noted that this type of public discourse not only involves the host and the expert, but also an overhearing audience (Clayman & Heritage, 2002; Hutchby, 1995); moreover, the host is positioned as the “tribune” of the people (Clayman, 2002), tasked with the responsibility to maximize the public’s understanding of and knowledge about what may concern them. While the audience as the third party in the question-answer sequence in news interviews has received considerable attention in the literature, less is known about how the interviewer works with the health expert’s responses to questions in order to facilitate the audience’s understanding of health initiatives. In this paper, we examine how the interviewer designs a follow-up turn to (1) provide background or supplemental information which contextualizes the interviewee's prior response and to (2) reformulate the expert’s explanation from the perspective of the general public, thereby facilitating the audience’s understanding of initiatives pertaining to public health.
使机构信息成为可能:电视记者与被采访者回应的工作
在公共广播中,采访专家的主要目标是告知和教育观众,以造福社会利益(克莱曼,2013)。先前关于新闻采访的研究指出,这种类型的公共话语不仅涉及主持人和专家,还涉及无意中听到的听众(Clayman & Heritage, 2002;Hutchby, 1995);此外,主持人被定位为人民的“论坛”(Clayman, 2002),其任务是最大限度地提高公众对他们可能关心的事情的理解和知识。虽然观众作为新闻采访中问答序列的第三方在文献中受到了相当大的关注,但很少有人知道采访者如何与卫生专家的问题回答一起工作,以促进观众对卫生倡议的理解。在本文中,我们研究了访谈者如何设计后续转向:(1)提供背景或补充信息,将访谈者先前的回应置于背景中;(2)从公众的角度重新阐述专家的解释,从而促进听众对与公共卫生有关的倡议的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信