THE ROLE OF COST IN THE MINIMUM PRICING OF RAILROAD SERVICES. IN: RAILWAYS

W. Baumol, J. C. Bonbright, Y. Brozen, J. Dean, F. K. Edwards, C. B. Hoover, D. F. Pegrum, M. Roberts, E. W. Williams
{"title":"THE ROLE OF COST IN THE MINIMUM PRICING OF RAILROAD SERVICES. IN: RAILWAYS","authors":"W. Baumol, J. C. Bonbright, Y. Brozen, J. Dean, F. K. Edwards, C. B. Hoover, D. F. Pegrum, M. Roberts, E. W. Williams","doi":"10.1086/294531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a statement by ten economists to clarify the economic principles of costs that are relevant as a guide to the pricing of particular railroad services. The statement, concerned with basic concepts of cost, provides some of the essential groundwork for the development of improved techniques for the measurement of relevant costs in specific situations. The authors conclude that incremental costs of a particular service are the only relevant costs in the determination of cost floors as a guide to the pricing of particular railroad services. Rates for particular services should be set at such amounts as will make the greatest total contribution to net income. Pricing which is not restricted by any minimum other than incremental costs can foster more efficient use of railway resources and capacity and can therefore encourage lower costs and rates. The presence of large amounts of fixed costs and unused capacity in railroad facilities makes it especially important that railroad rates encourage a large volume of traffic. Reduced rates that more than cover incremental costs and are designed by management to maximize contribution to net income are not proof of predatory competition. Fully distributed costs derived by apportioning unallocable costs have no economic significance in determining rate floors for particular railroad services. The application of such criterion would force the railroads to maintain rates above the level which would yield maximum contribution to net income and deprive them of traffic for which they can compete economically.","PeriodicalId":183852,"journal":{"name":"Classics in Transport Analysis","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classics in Transport Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/294531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents a statement by ten economists to clarify the economic principles of costs that are relevant as a guide to the pricing of particular railroad services. The statement, concerned with basic concepts of cost, provides some of the essential groundwork for the development of improved techniques for the measurement of relevant costs in specific situations. The authors conclude that incremental costs of a particular service are the only relevant costs in the determination of cost floors as a guide to the pricing of particular railroad services. Rates for particular services should be set at such amounts as will make the greatest total contribution to net income. Pricing which is not restricted by any minimum other than incremental costs can foster more efficient use of railway resources and capacity and can therefore encourage lower costs and rates. The presence of large amounts of fixed costs and unused capacity in railroad facilities makes it especially important that railroad rates encourage a large volume of traffic. Reduced rates that more than cover incremental costs and are designed by management to maximize contribution to net income are not proof of predatory competition. Fully distributed costs derived by apportioning unallocable costs have no economic significance in determining rate floors for particular railroad services. The application of such criterion would force the railroads to maintain rates above the level which would yield maximum contribution to net income and deprive them of traffic for which they can compete economically.
成本在铁路服务最低定价中的作用。:铁路
本文提出了十位经济学家的陈述,以澄清与特定铁路服务定价相关的成本经济原则。该说明涉及费用的基本概念,为发展在具体情况下衡量有关费用的改进技术提供了一些基本基础。作者得出结论,特定服务的增量成本是确定成本下限作为特定铁路服务定价指南的唯一相关成本。特定服务的费率应确定为对净收入贡献最大的总额。定价不受任何最低限度的限制,而只受增加成本的限制,可以促进更有效地利用铁路资源和能力,因此可以鼓励降低成本和费率。铁路设施中存在大量的固定成本和未使用的运力,这使得铁路费率鼓励大量交通变得尤为重要。如果降价幅度超过了增加的成本,并且是由管理层设计的,以最大限度地提高净收入,那就不能证明存在掠夺性竞争。通过分摊不可分配成本而得出的完全分配成本在确定特定铁路服务的最低费率方面没有经济意义。这种标准的应用将迫使铁路公司将费率维持在对净收入贡献最大的水平之上,并剥夺他们可以在经济上竞争的客运量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信