Russian Science as an Object of Unfair Global Competition

L. P. Kleevа, S. Maksimov
{"title":"Russian Science as an Object of Unfair Global Competition","authors":"L. P. Kleevа, S. Maksimov","doi":"10.47361/2542-0259-2022-2-30-28-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the manifestations and consequences for Russian science of the phenomenon of monopolization by a narrow group of foreign economic entities (the collective dominant in the information technology sphere) of the global R&D markets, scientific publications and services that provide them, including services for access to aggregated scientific data and analytics, etc.).It is concluded that the key tool for monopolizing the relevant markets is lobbying the interests of the collective dominant in international organizations and state authorities representing the interests of competitors, establishing direct and indirect control over market entry barriers for all other participants.According to the authors, the bad faith of global competition on the part of foreign participants in collective dominance in relation to Russian scientific and educational organizations in the respective markets is manifested primarily in the absolute and relative «leakage» of the most qualified scientists and specialists from the country, as well as the results of scientific activity. This was facilitated by the introduction into the regulatory practice of the country of the so-called «international» standards of scientific publication activity, reporting, performance of scientific qualification works, global competition of economic entities in the scientific and educational sphere.The authors propose and justify a number of measures aimed at overcoming the dependence of Russian science and higher education on the negative impact of global unfair competition in the relevant field. The basis of these measures should be the development of a new national (mainly expert) system for assessing the effectiveness of scientific activities, the effectiveness of scientific and educational organizations, which would be focused on ensuring sustainable development, security and sovereignty of the country, strengthening the spiritual and moral health of the nation and increasing the well-being of its citizens.","PeriodicalId":250547,"journal":{"name":"Russian competition law and economy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian competition law and economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2022-2-30-28-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the manifestations and consequences for Russian science of the phenomenon of monopolization by a narrow group of foreign economic entities (the collective dominant in the information technology sphere) of the global R&D markets, scientific publications and services that provide them, including services for access to aggregated scientific data and analytics, etc.).It is concluded that the key tool for monopolizing the relevant markets is lobbying the interests of the collective dominant in international organizations and state authorities representing the interests of competitors, establishing direct and indirect control over market entry barriers for all other participants.According to the authors, the bad faith of global competition on the part of foreign participants in collective dominance in relation to Russian scientific and educational organizations in the respective markets is manifested primarily in the absolute and relative «leakage» of the most qualified scientists and specialists from the country, as well as the results of scientific activity. This was facilitated by the introduction into the regulatory practice of the country of the so-called «international» standards of scientific publication activity, reporting, performance of scientific qualification works, global competition of economic entities in the scientific and educational sphere.The authors propose and justify a number of measures aimed at overcoming the dependence of Russian science and higher education on the negative impact of global unfair competition in the relevant field. The basis of these measures should be the development of a new national (mainly expert) system for assessing the effectiveness of scientific activities, the effectiveness of scientific and educational organizations, which would be focused on ensuring sustainable development, security and sovereignty of the country, strengthening the spiritual and moral health of the nation and increasing the well-being of its citizens.
俄罗斯科学是全球不公平竞争的对象
这篇文章专门分析了少数外国经济实体(在信息技术领域占主导地位的集体)垄断全球研发市场、科学出版物和提供这些市场的服务(包括获取汇总科学数据和分析等服务)的现象对俄罗斯科学的表现和后果。结论是,垄断相关市场的关键工具是在代表竞争者利益的国际组织和国家当局中游说集体支配者的利益,为所有其他参与者建立对市场进入壁垒的直接和间接控制。作者认为,外国参与者对俄罗斯科学和教育组织在各自市场上的集体主导地位的全球竞争的恶意主要表现在该国最合格的科学家和专家的绝对和相对“流失”,以及科学活动的结果。在国家的管理实践中引入了所谓的“国际”标准,包括科学出版活动、报告、科学鉴定工作的执行、经济实体在科学和教育领域的全球竞争,从而促进了这一点。作者提出并论证了一些措施,旨在克服俄罗斯科学和高等教育对相关领域全球不公平竞争负面影响的依赖。这些措施的基础应该是发展一个新的国家(主要是专家)系统,以评估科学活动的有效性,科学和教育组织的有效性,其重点将是确保国家的可持续发展、安全和主权,加强国家的精神和道德健康,增加其公民的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信