Evaluation as the Co-Construction of Knowledge: Case Studies of Place-Based Leadership and Public Service Innovation

J. Howard, A. Flores, R. Hambleton
{"title":"Evaluation as the Co-Construction of Knowledge: Case Studies of Place-Based Leadership and Public Service Innovation","authors":"J. Howard, A. Flores, R. Hambleton","doi":"10.1108/S1474-786320140000015008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter introduces the notion of the ‘Innovation Story’ as a methodological approach to public policy evaluation, which builds in greater opportunity for learning and reflexivity. \n \nThe Innovation Story is an adaptation of the case study approach and draws on participatory action research traditions. It is a structured narrative that describes a particular public policy innovation in the personalised contexts in which it is experienced by innovators. Its construction involves a discursive process through which involved actors tell their story, explain it to others, listen to their questions and co-construct knowledge of change together. \n \nThe approach was employed to elaborate five case studies of place-based leadership and public service innovation in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands and Mexico. The key findings are that spaces in which civic leaders come together from different ‘realms’ of leadership in a locality (community, business, professional managers and political leaders) can become innovation zones that foster inventive behaviour. Much depends on the quality of civic leadership, and its capacity to foster genuine dialogue and co-responsibility. This involves the evaluation seeking out influential ideas from below the level of strategic management, and documenting leadership activities of those who are skilled at ‘boundary crossing’ – for example, communicating between sectors. \n \nThe evaluator can be a key player in this process, as a convenor of safe spaces for actors to come together to discuss and deliberate before returning to practice. Our approach therefore argues for a particular awareness of the political nature of policy evaluation in terms of negotiating these spaces, and the need for politically engaged evaluators who are skilled in facilitating collective learning processes.","PeriodicalId":171248,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Program Evaluation","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Program Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-786320140000015008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract This chapter introduces the notion of the ‘Innovation Story’ as a methodological approach to public policy evaluation, which builds in greater opportunity for learning and reflexivity. The Innovation Story is an adaptation of the case study approach and draws on participatory action research traditions. It is a structured narrative that describes a particular public policy innovation in the personalised contexts in which it is experienced by innovators. Its construction involves a discursive process through which involved actors tell their story, explain it to others, listen to their questions and co-construct knowledge of change together. The approach was employed to elaborate five case studies of place-based leadership and public service innovation in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands and Mexico. The key findings are that spaces in which civic leaders come together from different ‘realms’ of leadership in a locality (community, business, professional managers and political leaders) can become innovation zones that foster inventive behaviour. Much depends on the quality of civic leadership, and its capacity to foster genuine dialogue and co-responsibility. This involves the evaluation seeking out influential ideas from below the level of strategic management, and documenting leadership activities of those who are skilled at ‘boundary crossing’ – for example, communicating between sectors. The evaluator can be a key player in this process, as a convenor of safe spaces for actors to come together to discuss and deliberate before returning to practice. Our approach therefore argues for a particular awareness of the political nature of policy evaluation in terms of negotiating these spaces, and the need for politically engaged evaluators who are skilled in facilitating collective learning processes.
评价作为知识的共同建构:以地方领导与公共服务创新为例
本章介绍了“创新故事”的概念,作为公共政策评估的方法论方法,它为学习和反思提供了更多的机会。创新故事是案例研究方法的改编,并借鉴了参与式行动研究的传统。它是一种结构化的叙述,描述了创新者在个性化背景下经历的特定公共政策创新。它的构建涉及到一个话语过程,通过这个过程,参与者讲述他们的故事,向他人解释,倾听他们的问题,共同构建关于变化的知识。采用这一方法,在联合王国、荷兰和墨西哥详细阐述了基于地方的领导和公共服务创新的五个案例研究。研究的主要发现是,来自当地不同领导领域(社区、企业、职业经理人和政治领袖)的公民领袖聚集在一起的空间可以成为促进创新行为的创新区。这在很大程度上取决于公民领导的质量及其促进真正对话和共同责任的能力。这包括从战略管理层次以下寻找有影响力的想法的评估,以及记录那些擅长“跨越边界”的人的领导活动——例如,在部门之间进行沟通。评估者可以在这个过程中扮演关键角色,作为安全空间的召集人,让参与者在返回练习之前聚在一起讨论和深思熟虑。因此,我们的方法主张在谈判这些空间方面对政策评估的政治性质有特别的认识,并且需要政治参与的评估人员,他们善于促进集体学习过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信