Perbandingan Interpretasi Analisis Data Page View dan Click Related Post Pada Website Edukasi Sebagai Implisit Feedback Dengan Hasil Interpretasi Penggunaan Teknologi EyeTracking

Riad Taufik Lazwardi, Khoirul Umam
{"title":"Perbandingan Interpretasi Analisis Data Page View dan Click Related Post Pada Website Edukasi Sebagai Implisit Feedback Dengan Hasil Interpretasi Penggunaan Teknologi EyeTracking","authors":"Riad Taufik Lazwardi, Khoirul Umam","doi":"10.32627/INTERNAL.V3I2.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis used in this study uses the help of Google Analytics to understand how the user's behavior on the Calculus learning material educational website page. Are users interested in recommendation articles? The answer to this question provides insight into the user's decision process and suggests how far a click is the result of an informed decision. Based on these results, it is hoped that a strategy to generate feedback from clicks should emerge. To evaluate the extent to which feedback shows relevance, versus implicit feedback to explicit feedback collected manually. The study presented in this study differs in at least two ways from previous work assessing the reliability of implicit feedback. First, this study aims to provide detailed insight into the user decision-making process through the use of a recommendation system with an implicit feedback feature. Second, evaluate the relative preferences that come from user behavior (user behavior). This differs from previous studies which primarily assessed absolute feedback. ","PeriodicalId":421147,"journal":{"name":"INTERNAL (Information System Journal)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNAL (Information System Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32627/INTERNAL.V3I2.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis used in this study uses the help of Google Analytics to understand how the user's behavior on the Calculus learning material educational website page. Are users interested in recommendation articles? The answer to this question provides insight into the user's decision process and suggests how far a click is the result of an informed decision. Based on these results, it is hoped that a strategy to generate feedback from clicks should emerge. To evaluate the extent to which feedback shows relevance, versus implicit feedback to explicit feedback collected manually. The study presented in this study differs in at least two ways from previous work assessing the reliability of implicit feedback. First, this study aims to provide detailed insight into the user decision-making process through the use of a recommendation system with an implicit feedback feature. Second, evaluate the relative preferences that come from user behavior (user behavior). This differs from previous studies which primarily assessed absolute feedback. 
在本研究中使用的分析使用谷歌分析的帮助下,了解如何用户的行为在微积分学习材料教育网站的网页。用户对推荐文章感兴趣吗?这个问题的答案可以让我们深入了解用户的决策过程,并暗示点击的程度是明智决策的结果。基于这些结果,希望一种从点击中产生反馈的策略应该出现。评估反馈显示相关性的程度,将隐式反馈与手动收集的显式反馈进行比较。本研究提出的研究至少在两个方面不同于以往的工作评估内隐反馈的可靠性。首先,本研究旨在通过使用具有隐式反馈特征的推荐系统来详细了解用户决策过程。其次,评估来自用户行为(用户行为)的相对偏好。这与之前主要评估绝对反馈的研究不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信