Comparative Assessment of the NPP Risk (on the Example of Rostov and Kalinin NPP). Development of Risk Indicators Atlas for Russian NPPs

Кирилл Чернявский, K. Chernyavskii, Мария Берберова, Mariya Berberova
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of the NPP Risk (on the Example of Rostov and Kalinin NPP). Development of Risk Indicators Atlas for Russian NPPs","authors":"Кирилл Чернявский, K. Chernyavskii, Мария Берберова, Mariya Berberova","doi":"10.30987/graphicon-2019-2-290-294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of the work is to compare and analyze external and internal exposure doses and assess damage to the population living around nuclear power plants with VVER-type reactors (on the Rostov and Kalinin nuclear power plants), within a certain radius, taking into account the wind rose. There will also be proposed measures for the possible addition and refinement of formulas. The method of calculating the doses of external and internal exposure, as well as damage to the population in the ring segment of rumba. External and internal exposure doses for Kalinin and Rostov NPPs have been considered. An assessment of material damage was conducted. A variant of the format of the atlas of risk assessments is proposed. Initial assumptions have been made regarding the discrepancy in the results obtained for both doses and damage. One of the possible reasons for the discrepancy in the results of calculating the dose and damage to the Kursk and Smolensk NPPs may be the difference in the terrain. We need to take this into account. By relief changes we mean not ravines and slopes, but hills, mountains, fields. Additionally, you can consider the type of terrain: steppes, forests, etc., although all this will contribute to the already quite a long distance from the nuclear power plant. In the future, it is planned to continue work on the atlas of risk assessments and think over its more convenient format.","PeriodicalId":409819,"journal":{"name":"GraphiCon'2019 Proceedings. Volume 2","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GraphiCon'2019 Proceedings. Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30987/graphicon-2019-2-290-294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The object of the work is to compare and analyze external and internal exposure doses and assess damage to the population living around nuclear power plants with VVER-type reactors (on the Rostov and Kalinin nuclear power plants), within a certain radius, taking into account the wind rose. There will also be proposed measures for the possible addition and refinement of formulas. The method of calculating the doses of external and internal exposure, as well as damage to the population in the ring segment of rumba. External and internal exposure doses for Kalinin and Rostov NPPs have been considered. An assessment of material damage was conducted. A variant of the format of the atlas of risk assessments is proposed. Initial assumptions have been made regarding the discrepancy in the results obtained for both doses and damage. One of the possible reasons for the discrepancy in the results of calculating the dose and damage to the Kursk and Smolensk NPPs may be the difference in the terrain. We need to take this into account. By relief changes we mean not ravines and slopes, but hills, mountains, fields. Additionally, you can consider the type of terrain: steppes, forests, etc., although all this will contribute to the already quite a long distance from the nuclear power plant. In the future, it is planned to continue work on the atlas of risk assessments and think over its more convenient format.
核电站风险比较评估(以罗斯托夫和加里宁核电站为例)。俄罗斯核电站风险指标图集的编制
这项工作的目的是比较和分析外部和内部暴露剂量,并评估在一定半径范围内,考虑到风升,居住在带有vver型反应堆的核电站周围的人口(在罗斯托夫和加里宁核电站)的损害。还将提出可能增加和改进公式的措施。计算伦巴环段外照射和内照射剂量以及对人群损害的方法。考虑了加里宁和罗斯托夫核电站的外照射剂量和内照射剂量。对物质损失进行了评估。提出了风险评估地图集格式的一种变体。对剂量和损害结果的差异作出了初步假设。库尔斯克和斯摩棱斯克核电站的剂量和损害计算结果不一致的一个可能原因可能是地形不同。我们需要考虑到这一点。我们所说的地形变化不是指沟壑和斜坡,而是指丘陵、山脉和田野。此外,你还可以考虑地形类型:草原、森林等,尽管所有这些都将使离核电站的距离变得相当远。未来,计划继续开展风险评估图集的工作,并考虑其更方便的格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信