Legitimate Restrictions

Matthew H Kramer
{"title":"Legitimate Restrictions","authors":"Matthew H Kramer","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868651.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the principle of freedom of expression is a moral absolute that imposes general duties which bind all systems of governance always and everywhere, it is consistent with various legal or governmental restrictions on modes of expression—provided that those restrictions are directed against the modes of expression not qua modes of expression but instead qua communication-independent misconduct. This chapter explores this aspect of the principle of freedom of expression by cataloguing various types of communicative conduct that can properly be subjected to legal restrictions. Among those types of communicative conduct are perjury, libel, solicitation to commit a crime, true threats, fighting words, incitement (in the sense of the term articulated by the U.S. Supreme court ruling in Brandenburg v Ohio), and fraud. All of these types of communicative conduct, along with several others, can be legally prohibited in accordance with the principle of freedom of expression.","PeriodicalId":422735,"journal":{"name":"Freedom of Expression as Self-Restraint","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Freedom of Expression as Self-Restraint","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868651.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the principle of freedom of expression is a moral absolute that imposes general duties which bind all systems of governance always and everywhere, it is consistent with various legal or governmental restrictions on modes of expression—provided that those restrictions are directed against the modes of expression not qua modes of expression but instead qua communication-independent misconduct. This chapter explores this aspect of the principle of freedom of expression by cataloguing various types of communicative conduct that can properly be subjected to legal restrictions. Among those types of communicative conduct are perjury, libel, solicitation to commit a crime, true threats, fighting words, incitement (in the sense of the term articulated by the U.S. Supreme court ruling in Brandenburg v Ohio), and fraud. All of these types of communicative conduct, along with several others, can be legally prohibited in accordance with the principle of freedom of expression.
合法的限制
尽管言论自由原则是一种道德上的绝对原则,它规定了约束所有治理体系的一般义务,无论何时何地,但它与各种法律或政府对表达方式的限制是一致的——前提是这些限制针对的不是表达方式,而是与沟通无关的不当行为。本章通过对可以适当地受到法律限制的各种类型的交际行为进行分类来探讨表达自由原则的这一方面。这些类型的交流行为包括伪证、诽谤、引诱犯罪、真正的威胁、打架的话、煽动(在美国最高法院对勃兰登堡诉俄亥俄州一案的裁决中所阐述的术语的意义上)和欺诈。根据言论自由的原则,所有这些类型的交流行为以及其他几种行为都可以在法律上被禁止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信